Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445450›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Multi-Site Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Facilitates Upper Limb Sensory and Motor Recovery in Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study.

Pawan Sharma, Tudor Panta, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Robert J Bert, Yury Gerasimenko, Gail Forrest, Susan Harkema

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06698224 (Paired Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Hand Function Recovery in Humans Post Cervical SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06698224 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Paired Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Hand Function Recovery in Humans Post Cervical SCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorKessler FoundationRan2025 to 2026Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Disease, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)ArmsSpinal cord transcutaneous stimulation, Paired spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pawan SharmaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Tudor PantaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Beatrice UgiliwenezaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Robert J BertDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Yury GerasimenkoKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Gail ForrestDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07052, USA.
Susan HarkemaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
University of Louisville · USRehabilitation Institute of Michigan · USNeurological Surgery · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Kessler FoundationLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust 2016PG-MED001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) rank regaining arm and hand function as their top rehabilitation priority post-injury. Cervical spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) combined with activity-based recovery training (ABRT) is known to effectively facilitate upper extremity sensorimotor recovery in individuals with residual arm and hand function post SCI. However, scTS effectiveness in facilitating upper extremity recovery in individuals with severe SCI with minimal to no sensory and motor preservation below injury level remains largely unknown. We herein introduced a multimodal neuro-rehabilitative approach involving scTS targeting systematically identified various spinal segments combined with ABRT. We hypothesized that multi-site scTS combined with ABRT will effectively neuromodulate the spinal networks, resulting in improved integration of ascending and descending neural information required for sensory and motor recovery in individuals with severe cervical SCI. To test the hypothesis, a 53-year-old male (C2, AIS A, 8 years post-injury) received 60 ABRT sessions combined with continuous multi-site scTS. Post-training assessments revealed improved activation of previously paralyzed upper extremity muscles and sensory improvements over the dorsal and volar aspects of the hand. Most likely, altered spinal cord excitability and improved muscle activation and sensations resulted in observed sensorimotor recovery. However, despite promising neurophysiological evidence pertaining to motor re-activation, we did not observe visually appreciable functional recovery on obtained upper extremity motor assessments.

Indexed as

cervical spinal cord injurymotor rehabilitationneuromodulationspinal cord excitabilityspinal cord transcutaneous stimulationupper limb

Identifiers

PMID37445450
PMCPMC10342540
OpenAlexW4382940854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.