ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Presence of Pleural Effusion in the Assessment of Remote Dielectric Sensing.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote dielectric sensing for pulmonary congestion assessment: current concepts and clinical perspectives.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system is a recently introduced non-invasive technology used to easily estimate the degree of lung fluid volume without any expert techniques. In the previous literature, ReDS values had a moderate correlation with invasively measured pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), the gold standard for representing left heart preload. Considering the mechanism of ReDS technology, ReDS values may be inappropriately elevated in the presence of pleural effusion (PE), and the ability of the ReDS system to estimate PAWP may decrease in such a situation.
methodsIn-hospital patients with cardiovascular diseases underwent computed tomography, and the presence of pleural effusion (PE) was evaluated. The measurement of ReDS values using the ReDS system and the measurement of PAWP using invasive right heart catheterization were also performed simultaneously. The impact of the presence of PE on the relationship between the ReDS values and PAWP was evaluated.
resultsA total of 59 patients (79 years, 30 male) were included. The median ReDS value was 25% (IQR: 22%, 30%) and the median PAWP level was 13 (IQR: 10, 18) mmHg. Of these patients, 11 had PE. PAWP was not significantly different between the two groups, whereas the ReDS values in the PE group were significantly higher than in the no-PE group. The impact of the presence of PE on the ReDS values was significant, with a beta value of 6.61 (95% confidence interval: 4.80-8.42,
conclusionsWe should pay attention to interpreting ReDS values when assessing the degree of pulmonary congestion in patients with PE, because ReDS values may be inappropriately elevated in this cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.