Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445350›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Validation of the Polish Version of Knee Outcome Survey Activities of the Daily Living Scale in a Group of Patients after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Magdalena Szczepanik, Jarosław Jabłoński, Agnieszka Bejer, Katarzyna Bazarnik-Mucha, Joanna Majewska, Sławomir Snela, Daniel Szymczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena SzczepanikInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2560-4436
Jarosław JabłońskiInstitute of Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Agnieszka BejerInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5305-6548
Katarzyna Bazarnik-MuchaInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5107-3272
Joanna MajewskaInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-0381
Sławomir SnelaInstitute of Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Daniel SzymczykInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-3759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Polish version of Knee Outcome Survey Activities of the Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) in a group of patients after arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

methodsThe study was a longitudinal study with repeated measures. One hundred and twelve subjects who qualified for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (mean age = 31.8 years) were initially enrolled in this study. The Polish version of KOS-ADLS and Short Form-36 v. 2.0 (SF-36) were used.

resultsThe Polish version of KOS-ADLS in subjects after ACL rupture demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for KOS-ADLS- total = 0.91), and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC-total = 0.98). The standard error of measurement (SEM) value was 0.81 and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 2.23 for KOS-ADLS-total. The validity analysis showed a moderate and low correlation between KOS-ADLS and different domains of SF-36 from r = 0.354 between KOS-ADLS activity and the physical component scale (PCS) of SF-36: to r = 0.206 between KOS-ADLS activity and the mental component scale (MCS) of SF-36.

conclusionsThe Polish version of KOS-ADLS turned out to be a reliable, valid and responsive self-reported outcome measure, allowing for the self-assessment of symptoms and function related to the knee joint impairment after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the scale can be applied in clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionKOS-ADLSpsychometricsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID37445350
PMCPMC10342456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.