ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Factors Predicting the Final Diagnosis in Image-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Suspected Spinal Tumors.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis, Prevention, Management, and Prognostication of Delirium in Acute-Care Neurosurgical Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Accuracy of CT- vs. Fluoroscopic-Guided Biopsy in Spinal Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of quantitative SPECT/CT integrated parameters for differentiating spinal tuberculosis from spinal metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Image-Guided Percutaneous Spinal Biopsy: CT or C-Arm Guidance?The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cases of suspected spinal tumors on imaging studies, a biopsy is often necessary for establishing the diagnosis. Predictive factors for tumors or malignancies may help in scheduling biopsies or avoiding unnecessary ones. However, there have been few studies on determining these factors. We aimed to determine the factors associated with the final diagnosis in cases requiring spinal biopsy. This study included 117 patients who underwent image-guided (fluoroscopy- or computed tomography [CT]-guided) needle biopsy of the spine. Data on patient demographic, pathological diagnoses, and final diagnoses were retrospectively collected from the medical records. The imaging features and location of lesions were also evaluated on CT and magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, factors related to tumors or malignancies were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of biopsy was 94.0%, and there was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the fluoroscopic and CT-guided biopsies. Sixty-six and fifty-six patients were diagnosed with spinal tumors and malignant tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of malignant tumors and the presence of pedicle lesions and/or extravertebral lesions were related factors for both tumors or malignancy in the final diagnosis. These findings can help determine the necessity for or timing of biopsy in patients with suspected spinal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.