ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Personalized Respiratory Support in ARDS: A Physiology-to-Bedside Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of rescue noninvasive ventilation for post-extubation respiratory failure.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Physiological effects of awake prone position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury in ARDS: From Physiological Concept to Clinical Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically Ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Heart-Lung Interactions in Combined Distributive Shock and ARDS: Applied Cardiopulmonary Physiology at the Bedside.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Open lung ventilation with low tidal volumes, staircase recruitment maneuvers, high PEEP and decremental PEEP titration vs ARDSNet in ARDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Digital twins suggest a mechanistic basis for differing responses to increased flow rates during high-flow nasal cannula therapy.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and burnout related to respiratory support among healthcare professionals in central China: a structural equation modeling study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Patients with Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Narrative Review of the Physiological Rationale and Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- The Relevance of the Endothelium in Cardiopulmonary Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Timing of intubation of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant patients: an international survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Redefining ARDS: a paradigm shift.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Pneumonic Injury and Repair: A Synopsis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, and while no specific etiologic interventions have been shown to improve outcomes, noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies are life-saving interventions that allow time for lung recovery. However, the inappropriate management of these strategies, which neglects the unique features of respiratory, lung, and chest wall mechanics may result in disease progression, such as patient self-inflicted lung injury during spontaneous breathing or by ventilator-induced lung injury during invasive mechanical ventilation. ARDS characteristics are highly heterogeneous; therefore, a physiology-based approach is strongly advocated to titrate the delivery and management of respiratory support strategies to match patient characteristics and needs to limit ARDS progression. Several tools have been implemented in clinical practice to aid the clinician in identifying the ARDS sub-phenotypes based on physiological peculiarities (inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and recruitability), thus allowing for the appropriate application of personalized supportive care. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies, as well as discuss how identifying ARDS sub-phenotypes in daily practice can help clinicians to deliver personalized respiratory support and potentially improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.