ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Research on the Rule of Explosion Shock Wave Propagation in Multi-Stage Cavity Energy-Absorbing Structures.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Temperature Measurement and System Identification Method for Confined Cavity Explosions Based on an Improved Type C Thermocouple Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The propagation laws of explosion shock waves and flames in various chambers were explored through a self-built large-scale gas explosion experimental system. The propagation process of shock waves inside the cavity was explored through numerical simulation using Ansys Fluent, and an extended study was conducted on the wave attenuation effect of multiple cavities connected in a series. The findings show that the cavity's length and diameter influenced the weakening impact of shock waves and explosive flames. By creating a reverse shock wave through complicated superposition, the cavity's shock wave weakening mechanism worked. By suppressing detonation creation inside the cavity, the explosive flame was weakened by the cavity's design. The multi-stage cavity exhibited sound-weakening effects on both shock waves and explosive flames, and an expression was established for the relationship between the suppression rate of shock force and the number of cavities. Diffusion cavities 35, 55, 58, and 85 successfully suppressed explosive flames. The multi-stage cavity efficiently reduced the explosion shock wave. The flame suppression rate of the 58-35 diffusion cavity explosion was 93.38%, whereas it was 97.31% for the 58-35-55 cavity explosion. In engineering practice, employing the 58-58 cavity is advised due to the construction area, construction cost, and wave attenuation impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.