Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444920›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Strength Assessment of PET Composite Prosthetic Sockets.

Yogeshvaran R Nagarajan, Farukh Farukh, Vadim V Silberschmidt, Karthikeyan Kandan, Radheshyam Rathore, Amit Kumar Singh, Pooja Mukul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yogeshvaran R NagarajanInstitute of Engineering Sciences, School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.
Farukh FarukhInstitute of Engineering Sciences, School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9133-7896
Vadim V SilberschmidtWolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3338-3311
Karthikeyan KandanInstitute of Engineering Sciences, School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.
Radheshyam RathoreDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur 302017, India.
Amit Kumar SinghDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur 302017, India.
Pooja MukulBhagwan Mahaveer Viklang Sahayata Samiti (BMVSS), Jaipur 302017, India.

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences GCRFNG\100125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prosthesis is loaded by forces and torques exerted by its wearer, the amputee, and should withstand instances of peak loads without failure. Traditionally, strong prosthetic sockets were made using a composite with a variety of reinforcing fibres, such as glass, carbon, and Kevlar. Amputees in less-resourced nations can lack access to composite prosthetic sockets due to their unavailability or prohibitive cost. Therefore, this study investigates the feasibility of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibre-reinforced composites as a low-cost sustainable composite for producing functional lower-limb prosthetic sockets. Two types of these composites were manufactured using woven and knitted fabric with a vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM) process. For direct comparison purposes, traditional prosthetic-socket materials were also manufactured from laminated composite (glass-fibre-reinforced (GFRP)), monolithic thermoplastic (polypropylene (PP) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE)) were also manufactured. Dog-bone-shaped specimens were cut from flat laminates and monolithic thermoplastic to evaluate their mechanical properties following ASTM standards. The mechanical properties of PET-woven and PET-knitted composites were found to have demonstrated to be considerably superior to those of traditional socket materials, such as PP and HDPE. All the materials were also tested in the socket form using a bespoke test rig reproducing forefoot loading according to the ISO standard 10328. The static structural test of sockets revealed that all met the target load-bearing capacity of 125 kg. Like GFRP, the PETW and PETK sockets demonstrated higher deformation and stiffness resistance than their monolithic counterparts made from PP and HDPE. As a result, it was concluded that the PET-based composite could replace monolithic socket materials in producing durable and affordable prostheses.

Indexed as

ISO socket testingknitted compositePET fibre-reinforced compositepolypropylene and high-density polyethyleneprosthetic socketstensile testingwoven laminate

Identifiers

PMID37444920
PMCPMC10342716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.