Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444795›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nurses' Silence: Understanding the Impacts of Second Victim Phenomenon among Israeli Nurses.

Rinat Cohen, Yael Sela, Inbal Halevi Hochwald, Rachel Nissanholz-Gannot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. An Exploration of Safety Culture, Second Victim Phenomenon and Negative Work Outcomes in Health Care Settings.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Second Victims Among Austrian Nurses (SeViD-A2 Study).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rinat CohenDepartment of Health Systems Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4076405, Israel.ORCID 0009-0006-8877-7480
Yael SelaNursing Department, Faculty of Social and Community Sciences, Ruppin Academic Center, Emeq-Hefer 4025000, Israel.
Inbal Halevi HochwaldSchool of Nursing, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, The Yezreel Valley, Emeq Yezreel 1930600, Israel.
Rachel Nissanholz-GannotDepartment of Health Systems Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4076405, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-2874
Ariel University · ILMyers-JDC-Brookdale Institute · ILRuppin Academic Center · ILThe Max Stern Yezreel Valley College · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 'second victim' phenomenon, (SVP) refers to a health professional who was involved in an adverse event (AE) and continues to suffer from the event to the detriment of personal and professional functioning. The second victims' natural history of recovery model predicts stages of the phenomenon from AE occurrence until the 'moving on' stage and serves as a suitable structure for many organizational support programs worldwide. PURPOSE: Using the second victims' natural history of recovery model to examine the impact of the SVP on Israeli nurses, with a specific focus on the organizational support they felt they required compared with the support they felt that they had received from their organizations.

methodsFifteen in-depth interviews were conducted, using a semi-structured questionnaire, among nurses who had experienced the SVP. The interviews were recorded subject to the interviewees' consent, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

findingsThroughout all six stages of recovery, all interviewees reported physical and emotional manifestations following exposure to an AE, regardless of the type of event or severity. They also reported difficulty in emotion regulation, as well as damage to functioning and overall quality of life. Most of the nurse interviewees reported a need to share the events with someone, but, despite this desire to receive appropriate support, almost none of them proactively requested help from a professional source, nor did their organizational management initiate proactive support. This lack of referral for further assistance is possibly explained through limited awareness of the SVP as a valid response to an AE, a perceived lack of legitimacy to receive organizational support, and personal barriers that accompany the phenomenon.

conclusionsAppropriate organizational support, offered proximal to an AE as well as over time, is essential for the nurse, the patient, and the organization. Personal barriers, together with limited awareness, may challenge the identification and provision of appropriate assistance. Hence, it is important to address the phenomenon as part of the general organizational policy to improve the quality of care and patient safety.

Indexed as

barriersnurseorganizational supportquality of caresecond victim phenomenon

Identifiers

PMID37444795
PMCPMC10340786
OpenAlexW4383552238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.