Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444674›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Learning and Developing Together for Improving the Quality of Care in a Nursing Home, Is Appreciative Inquiry the Key?

Regula Van Graas, Robbert J Gobbens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Regula Van GraasFaculty of Health, Sports, and Well-Being, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-1104-4141
Robbert J GobbensFaculty of Health, Sports, and Well-Being, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-5189

Funding

ZonMw 80-83900-98-905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the impact of Appreciative Inquiry (AI) on learning and developing together for improving the quality of care in a nursing home, and to explore experiences following the four phases of the AI cycle, an AI was performed as part of participative action research. Interviews, group discussions, creative methods of storytelling, and reflections were used in the AI sessions. Staff members were interviewed to evaluate the AI process. All of the interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed thematically using Maxqda and were discussed by the interviewers until consensus was reached. The sessions resulted in ten action proposals to improve healthcare. One proposal was worked out in agreements on cooperation. The evaluation revealed that the sessions have given a boost to the team spirit, and involvement at the location leading to more cooperation and communication during the shifts. The evaluation indicated that it is important to convert the action plans of the sessions into actions, which are then evaluated. AI was advised as a way of learning where everyone is involved, and mutual agreements are made. This study has shown that AI can be a valuable way to support learning and development to promote the quality of care in a nursing home.

Indexed as

appreciative inquirydevelopinglearningnursing homesquality of care

Identifiers

PMID37444674
PMCPMC10340465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.