Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444600›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

The Effectiveness of Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment and Rechallenge-A Systematic Review.

Adrian Perdyan, Bartosz Kamil Sobocki, Amar Balihodzic, Anna Dąbrowska, Justyna Kacperczyk, Jacek Rutkowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Treatment advances across the cervical cancer spectrum.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  13. Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Adrian Perdyan3P-Medicine Laboratory, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-4357
Bartosz Kamil SobockiStudent Scientific Circle of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-9701
Amar BalihodzicDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-6784
Anna DąbrowskaStudent Scientific Circle of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0026-241X
Justyna KacperczykThe University Clinical Centre in Gdansk, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-3016
Jacek RutkowskiDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Clinical Centre · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a great success of immunotherapy in cancer treatment, a great number of patients will become resistant. This review summarizes recent reports on immune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment or rechallenge in order to overcome primary resistance. The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. In total, 31 articles were included with a total of 812 patients. There were 16 retreatment studies and 13 rechallenge studies. We identified 15 studies in which at least one parameter (overall response rate or disease control rate) improved or was stable at secondary treatment. Interval treatment, primary response to and the cause of cessation for the first immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be promising predictors of secondary response. However, high heterogeneity of investigated cohorts and lack of reporting guidelines are limiting factors for current in-depth analysis.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitorsmelanomaoncologyrechallengeretreatment

Identifiers

PMID37444600
PMCPMC10340255
OpenAlexW4383226963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.