Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444548›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-Based Machine Learning Model Can Improve Prostate Cancer Detection in the Grey Area of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3: A Single-Centre Experience.

Caterina Gaudiano, Margherita Mottola, Lorenzo Bianchi, Beniamino Corcioni, Lorenzo Braccischi, Makoto Taninokuchi Tomassoni, Arrigo Cattabriga, Maria Adriana Cocozza, Francesca Giunchi, Riccardo Schiavina and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caterina GaudianoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Margherita MottolaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-1910
Lorenzo BianchiDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Beniamino CorcioniDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo BraccischiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Makoto Taninokuchi TomassoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Arrigo CattabrigaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-586X
Maria Adriana CocozzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-7722
Francesca GiunchiDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo SchiavinaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FantiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-2624
Michelangelo FiorentinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1749-150X
Eugenio BrunocillaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Cristina MosconiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro BevilacquaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-5058

Funding

Ministero della Salute RC-2022- 2773478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) has a key role in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the clinical interpretation of PI-RADS 3 score lesions may be challenging and misleading, thus postponing PCa diagnosis to biopsy outcome. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) radiomic analysis may represent a stand-alone noninvasive tool for PCa diagnosis. Hence, this study aims at developing a mpMRI-based radiomic PCa diagnostic model in a cohort of PI-RADS 3 lesions. We enrolled 133 patients with 155 PI-RADS 3 lesions, 84 of which had PCa confirmation by fusion biopsy. Local radiomic features were generated from apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and the four most informative were selected using LASSO, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (

Indexed as

machine learningmagnetic resonance imagingPI-RADS 3 lesionsprediction modelsprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37444548
PMCPMC10340607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.