Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444450›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Pulsed Electric Fields in Oncology: A Snapshot of Current Clinical Practices and Research Directions from the 4th World Congress of Electroporation.

Luca G Campana, Adil Daud, Francesco Lancellotti, Julio P Arroyo, Rafael V Davalos, Claudia Di Prata, Julie Gehl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pulsing Addition to Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca G CampanaDepartment of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8466-8459
Adil DaudDepartment of Medicine, University of California, 550 16 Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Francesco LancellottiDepartment of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1830-127X
Julio P ArroyoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-6337
Rafael V DavalosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-9509
Claudia Di PrataDepartment of Surgery, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy.
Julie GehlDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-0210
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBVirginia Tech · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

VT Initiative for Maximizing Student DiversityR25GM072767 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SMITH, EDWARD J · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM072767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 4th World Congress of Electroporation (Copenhagen, 9-13 October 2022) provided a unique opportunity to convene leading experts in pulsed electric fields (PEF). PEF-based therapies harness electric fields to produce therapeutically useful effects on cancers and represent a valuable option for a variety of patients. As such, irreversible electroporation (IRE), gene electrotransfer (GET), electrochemotherapy (ECT), calcium electroporation (Ca-EP), and tumour-treating fields (TTF) are on the rise. Still, their full therapeutic potential remains underappreciated, and the field faces fragmentation, as shown by parallel maturation and differences in the stages of development and regulatory approval worldwide. This narrative review provides a glimpse of PEF-based techniques, including key mechanisms, clinical indications, and advances in therapy; finally, it offers insights into current research directions. By highlighting a common ground, the authors aim to break silos, strengthen cross-functional collaboration, and pave the way to novel possibilities for intervention. Intriguingly, beyond their peculiar mechanism of action, PEF-based therapies share technical interconnections and multifaceted biological effects (e.g., vascular, immunological) worth exploiting in combinatorial strategies.

Indexed as

cancerelectrochemotherapyelectroporationgene electrotransferirreversible electroporationquality of lifetumour-treating fields

Identifiers

PMID37444450
PMCPMC10340685
OpenAlexW4382137065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.