ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Insights into Chemical Structure-Based Modeling for New Sweetener Discovery.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting sweet taste receptor T1R2/T1R3: a new strategy for metabolic disease regulation and intervention of multiple organ diseases.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Discovery of Novel Minor Steviol Glycoside from theBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Improving the Value Utilization of Tuna Peptide Powder for the Cosmetics Field Through Ozone Oxidation.Marine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The search for novel, natural, high-sweetness, low-calorie sweeteners remains open and challenging. In the present study, the structure-based machine learning modeling and sweetness recognition mechanism were investigated to assist this process. It was found that whether or not a compound was sweet was closely related to molecular connectivity and composition (the number of hydrogen bond acceptors and donors), tpsaEfficiency, structural complexity, and shape (nAtomP and Fsp3). While the relative sweetness of sweet compounds was more determined by the molecular properties (tpsaEfficiency and Log P), structural complexity and composition (nAtomP and ATSm 1). The built machine learning models exhibited very good performance for classifying the sweet/non-sweet compounds and predicting the relative sweetness of the compounds. Moreover, a specific binding pocket was found for sweet compounds, and the sweet compounds mainly interacted with the VFT domain of the T1R2-T1R3 through hydrogen bonds. In addition, the results indicated that among the sweet compounds, those that were sweeter bound to the VFT domain stronger than those that had low sweetness. This study provides very useful information for developing new sweeteners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.