Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444301›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Insights into Chemical Structure-Based Modeling for New Sweetener Discovery.

Ning Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ning TangBeijing Key Laboratory of Functional Food from Plant Resources, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-7769

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32001687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for novel, natural, high-sweetness, low-calorie sweeteners remains open and challenging. In the present study, the structure-based machine learning modeling and sweetness recognition mechanism were investigated to assist this process. It was found that whether or not a compound was sweet was closely related to molecular connectivity and composition (the number of hydrogen bond acceptors and donors), tpsaEfficiency, structural complexity, and shape (nAtomP and Fsp3). While the relative sweetness of sweet compounds was more determined by the molecular properties (tpsaEfficiency and Log P), structural complexity and composition (nAtomP and ATSm 1). The built machine learning models exhibited very good performance for classifying the sweet/non-sweet compounds and predicting the relative sweetness of the compounds. Moreover, a specific binding pocket was found for sweet compounds, and the sweet compounds mainly interacted with the VFT domain of the T1R2-T1R3 through hydrogen bonds. In addition, the results indicated that among the sweet compounds, those that were sweeter bound to the VFT domain stronger than those that had low sweetness. This study provides very useful information for developing new sweeteners.

Indexed as

bindingmachine learningsweetnesssweet tasteT1R2-T1R3

Identifiers

PMID37444301
PMCPMC10340280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.