ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pesticide Residues in Fruits: From Surveillance Data to Risk-Based Interpretation and Mitigation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pesticide Residues in Apples and Pears: A Deterministic Assessment of Chronic Exposure and Non-Carcinogenic Risk for European Consumers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Residual characteristics and chronic health risk assessment of multiple pesticides in 23 daily-consumed vegetables from Shandong, China: A 4-year investigation.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Pesticide residues in fruits from Riyadh markets: a three-year evaluation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Article
- Postharvest Disease Management of 'Akizuki' Pear in China: Identification of Fungal Pathogens and Control Efficacy of Chlorine Dioxide.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prioritization and Sensitivity of Pesticide Risks from Root and Tuber Vegetables.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Possible Genotoxic Effects of Post-Harvest Fungicides Applied on Citrus Peels: Imazalil, Pyrimethanil, Thiabendazole and Their Mixtures.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of Luteolin Treatment on Postharvest Quality and Antioxidant Capacity of Nanfeng Tangerines.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Citrus bliss: potassium, sodium, and calcium silicates secrets for post-harvest diseases of fruit defense.Italian journal of food safety · 2024Article
- Pesticide contamination pattern from Morocco, insights into the surveillance situation and health risk assessment: a review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides are extensively used in the cultivation and postharvest protection of citrus fruits, therefore continuous monitoring and health risk assessments of their residues are required. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of pesticide residues on citrus fruits and to evaluate the acute and chronic risk for adults and children. The risk ranking of twenty-three detected pesticides was carried out according to a matrix ranking scheme. Multiple residues were detected in 83% of 76 analyzed samples. In addition, 28% contained pesticides at or above maximum residue levels (MRLs). The most frequently detected pesticides were imazalil, azoxystrobin, and dimethomorph. According to the risk ranking method, imazalil was classified in the high-risk group, followed by prochloraz, chlorpyrifos, azinphos-methyl, tebufenpyrad, and fenpiroximate, which were considered to pose a medium risk. The majority of detected pesticides (74%) posed a low risk. The health risk assessment indicated that imazalil and thiabendazole contribute to acute (HQa) and chronic (HQc) dietary risk, respectively. The HQc was negligible for the general population, while the HQa of imazalil and thiabendazole exceeded the acceptable level in the worst-case scenario. Cumulative chronic/acute risk (HIc/HIa) assessment showed that chronic risk was acceptable in all samples for children and adults, while the acute risk was unacceptable in 5.3% of citrus fruits for adults and 26% of citrus fruits for children. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the ingestion rate and individual body weight were the most influential risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.