Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444154›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Occupational COVID-19 Exposures and Illnesses among Workers in California-Analysis of a New Occupational COVID-19 Surveillance System.

David Pham Bui, Kathryn Gibb, Martha Fiellin, Andrea Rodriguez, Claire Majka, Carolina Espineli, Elisabeth Gebreegziabher, Jennifer Flattery, Ximena P Vergara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David Pham BuiOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Kathryn GibbOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-5867
Martha FiellinOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Andrea RodriguezOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Claire MajkaOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Carolina EspineliOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Elisabeth GebreegziabherOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Jennifer FlatteryOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Ximena P VergaraOccupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-8399

Funding

California Work-Related Injury Fatality ProgramU60OH008468 · OH · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI HARRISON, ROBERT J · 2005 to 2025
$16.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about occupational SARS-CoV-2 exposures and COVID-19 outcomes. We established a Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Injury or Illness (DFR)-based surveillance system to study cases of work-related COVID-19 exposures and disease. The surveillance data included demographics, occupation, industry, exposure, and illness, details including hospitalization and lost work. We classified workers into 'healthcare', non-healthcare 'public-facing', or 'other' worker groups, and rural-urban commuting areas (RUCAs). We describe worker exposures and outcomes overall by worker group and RUCA. We analyzed 2848 COVID-19 DFRs representing workers in 22 detailed occupation groups and 19 industry groups. Most DFRs were for workers in metropolitan RUCAs (89%) and those in healthcare (42%) and public-facing (24%) worker groups. While DFRs were from 382 unique worksites, 52% were from four hospitals and one prison. Among 1063 DFRs with a suspected exposure, 73% suspected exposure to a patient or client. Few DFRs indicated hospitalization (3.9%); however, the proportion hospitalized was higher among nonmetropolitan (7.4%) and public-facing (6.7%) workers. While 56% of DFRs indicated some lost work time, the proportion was highest among public-facing (80%) workers. Healthcare and prison workers were the majority of reported occupational COVID-19 exposures and illnesses. The risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and lost work may be highest among nonmetropolitan and public-facing workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19CaliforniaHealth PersonnelHumansOccupationsSARS-CoV-2WorkplaceCOVID-19occupational healthSARS-CoV-2surveillanceworkers

Identifiers

PMID37444154
PMCPMC10341532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.