Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444127›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Diagnostic Accuracy of Frailty Screening Instruments Validated for Use among Older Adults Attending Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elizabeth Moloney, Mark R O'Donovan, Duygu Sezgin, Evelyn Flanagan, Keith McGrath, Suzanne Timmons, Rónán O'Caoimh

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Development of a Novel Frailty Trigger for Use at Triage in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Understanding frailty screening of older adults in the emergency department: A survey of emergency physicians in Ontario.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth MoloneyHRB Clinical Research Facility, Mercy University Hospital, University College Cork, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Mark R O'DonovanHRB Clinical Research Facility, Mercy University Hospital, University College Cork, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-7567
Duygu SezginSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Evelyn FlanaganHRB Clinical Research Facility, Mercy University Hospital, University College Cork, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Keith McGrathDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Suzanne TimmonsDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.
Rónán O'CaoimhHRB Clinical Research Facility, Mercy University Hospital, University College Cork, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-673X
University College Cork · IEMercy University Hospital · IEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of frailty can prevent functional decline. Although multiple frailty screens exist for use in Emergency Departments (EDs), few are validated against diagnostic standards such as comprehensive geriatric assessment. To examine the diagnostic accuracy of ED screens for frailty, scientific databases were searched for prospective diagnostic accuracy test studies from January 2000 to September 2022. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using QUADAS-C. Psychometric properties were extracted and analysed using R. Six studies involving 1,663 participants describing seven frailty screening instruments (PRISMA-7, CFS, VIP, FRESH, BPQ, TRST, and ISAR), representing 13 unique data points, were included. The mean age of participants ranged from 76 to 86 years. The proportion that was female ranged from 45 to 60%. The pooled prevalence rate of frailty was high at 59%. The pooled estimate for sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.91) versus 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) for specificity. Pooled accuracy based on area under the ROC curve was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90). Although few studies were found, limiting the ability to conduct a meta-analysis of individual instruments, available frailty screens can accurately diagnose frailty in older adults attending the ED. As specificity was comparatively low, additional assessment may be required to identify those requiring inpatient management or onward community referral. Further study is therefore required.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentdiagnostic test accuracyemergency departmentfrailtyinstrumentmeta-analysisolder adultscreeningsystematic reviewtool

Identifiers

PMID37444127
PMCPMC10341387
OpenAlexW4382982269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.