Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Social Representations of Hesitant Brazilians about Vaccination against COVID-19.

Keila Cristina Oliveira Dos Santos, Maria de Fátima Junqueira-Marinho, Adriana Teixeira Reis, Karla Gonçalves Camacho, Marcio Fernandes Nehab, Dimitri Marques Abramov, Zina Maria Almeida de Azevedo, Livia Almeida de Menezes, Margarida Dos Santos Salú, Carlos Eduardo da Silva Figueiredo and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began: lessons on vaccination and obstetric care in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Adherence of Brazilian Minors to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines after In-Person School Return.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Keila Cristina Oliveira Dos SantosNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-0105
Maria de Fátima Junqueira-MarinhoNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Adriana Teixeira ReisNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Karla Gonçalves CamachoNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-437X
Marcio Fernandes NehabNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Dimitri Marques AbramovNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Zina Maria Almeida de AzevedoNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Livia Almeida de MenezesNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Margarida Dos Santos SalúNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo da Silva FigueiredoNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Maria Elisabeth Lopes MoreiraNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-0294
Zilton Farias Meira de VasconcelosNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-2224
Flavia Amendola Anisio de CarvalhoNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Livia de Rezende de MelloNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Roberta Fernandes CorreiaNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Saint Clair Dos Santos Gomes JuniorNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-943X
Daniella Campelo Batalha Cox MooreNational Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira (IFF-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4576-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe control of the COVID-19 pandemic has been a great challenge. Understanding the thoughts and beliefs underlying vaccine hesitancy can help in the formulation of public policies. The present study aimed to analyze the social representations of hesitant Brazilians about vaccination against COVID-19.

methodsQualitative research guided by the Theory of Social Representations, carried out through an online survey among Brazilian adults living in Brazil. The data were analyzed using the IRaMuTeQ software.

resultsOf the 173,178 respondents, 10,928 were hesitant and declared reasons for vaccination hesitation. The analysis generated three classes: mistrust of the vaccine and underestimation of the severity of the pandemic; (dis)information and distrust of political involvement; and fear of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.

conclusionsSocial knowledge, presented by the representations apprehended in this study, demonstrates difficulty in discerning the reliability of information and a social imagination full of doubts and uncertainties. Understanding the internal dynamics of these groups, with their representations of the world, is important to propose policies and actions that echo and cause changes in the understanding of the role of immunization. It is essential to shed light on the sociological imagination so that gaps filled with false information can be dismantled and confronted with scientific knowledge accessible to the population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vaccination HesitancyAdultBrazilCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPublic PolicyReproducibility of ResultsSouth American PeopleVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesBrazilCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineshesitancy determinantsvaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37444052
PMCPMC10340750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.