Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444047›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Companion Animal Fostering as Health Promotion: A Literature Review.

Christine Roseveare, Mary Breheny, Juliana Mansvelt, Linda Murray, Marg Wilkie, M Carolyn Gates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine RoseveareSchool of Health Sciences, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9118-8082
Mary BrehenySchool of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1603-8033
Juliana MansveltSchool of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.
Linda MurraySchool of Health Sciences, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.
Marg WilkieResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-1520
M Carolyn GatesSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-1945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in the health-promoting potential of human-companion animal relationships from a broad public health perspective while acknowledging barriers to ownership, particularly for older adults. Companion animal fostering is an alternative to pet ownership that aligns with the Ottawa Charter health promotion principle that caring for others in everyday settings promotes health. This narrative review of the literature on companion animal fostering draws on Te Whare Tapa Whā (the four-sided house), an indigenous model of health that is influential in Aotearoa/New Zealand, and the Ottawa Charter. We found that companion animal fostering can be considered health-promoting for human and non-human animals, using a broad and multidimensional understanding of health. As well as improving the long-term outcomes for homeless animals, companion animal fostering has the potential to promote the health of the individuals, families, and communities who provide foster homes. Our review highlights the importance of health promoters considering the reciprocal relationship between human and animal health. Future research should explore different aspects of human and non-human health, perspectives of different types of fosterers in different settings and communities, barriers to fostering, and methods that explore the role of caring for a wider range of companion animals in creating and sustaining wellbeing.

Indexed as

Human-Animal BondPetsAgedAnimalsHealth PromotionHuman-Animal InteractionHumansNew Zealandageingcompanion animalsfosteringhealth promotionhuman–animal bondhuman–animal interactionOttawa CharterpetsTe Whare Tapa Whā

Identifiers

PMID37444047
PMCPMC10340564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.