Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37444005›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Association with Different Housing and Welfare Parameters on Results of a Novel Object Test in Laying Hen Flocks on Farm.

Jennifer Hüttner, Annette Clauß, Lea Klambeck, Robby Andersson, Nicole Kemper, Birgit Spindler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing and Improving Animal Welfare Using Applied Ethology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer HüttnerInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Annette ClaußInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-927X
Lea KlambeckDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Poultry Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany.
Robby AnderssonDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Poultry Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany.
Nicole KemperInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-4302
Birgit SpindlerInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8638-0718
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEOsnabrück University · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 491094227Lower Saxony Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Hannover, Germany no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this on-farm study was to determine if flocks showing feather damage and/or cannibalism would have a higher fear response to the novel object (NOT) and the association between different housing and welfare parameters on results of the NOT. Therefore, 16 flocks were observed during the laying period in Germany. In total, there were six barns, seven free-range, and three organic flocks. The plumage and integument condition of 50 birds of each flock were evaluated at 4 different times during the laying period (V1: 18th to 23rd week of life, V2: 26th to 35th week of life, V3: 49th to 57th week of life, V4: 61st to 73rd week of life). At the same observation times, the NOT was performed in the flocks (at four different locations per visit time). Based on the average number of hens gathered around the novel object (NO) within the period of two minutes, conclusions can be made about the fearfulness of the flock. The present study shows that the more fearful a flock was, the more frequent feather damage (

Indexed as

animal welfarecannibalismfeather peckinglaying hensnovel object

Identifiers

PMID37444005
PMCPMC10339980
OpenAlexW4383368546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.