Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443957›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Creep Feeding Effects on Piglet Pre- and Post-Weaning Performance.

Bruno B D Muro, Rafaella F Carnevale, Matheus S Monteiro, Renjie Yao, Felipe N A Ferreira, Clarice S S Neta, Francisco A Pereira, Dominiek Maes, Geert P J Janssens, Glen W Almond and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bruno B D MuroDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Rafaella F CarnevaleDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-6008
Matheus S MonteiroNerthus Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento LTDA, São Carlos 13563-651, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1949-6697
Renjie YaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Felipe N A FerreiraAgreceres Multimix Nutrição Animal LTDA, Rio Claro 13502-741, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-1674
Clarice S S NetaAgreceres Multimix Nutrição Animal LTDA, Rio Claro 13502-741, SP, Brazil.
Francisco A PereiraDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Dominiek MaesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Geert P J JanssensDepartment of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-3657
Glen W AlmondDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Cesar A P GarbossaDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-7184
Tatiane T N WatanabeDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Diego F LealDepartment of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-2382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the effects of providing piglets with creep feed during lactation on piglet pre- and post-weaning performance. A total of 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. Creep feeding in lactation improved pre-weaning piglet performance in 46% of the studies selected, while 58% of the included studies reported that creep feeding in lactation improved piglet performance during the nursery phase. Creep feeding increased the average piglet body weight (creep = 7.23 ± 0.30, no creep = 6.96 ± 0.31;

Indexed as

creep feedinggrowth performancelactationpigletweaning

Identifiers

PMID37443957
PMCPMC10340024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.