Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443696›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Recent Advances of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interstitial Lung Diseases.

Konstantinos P Exarchos, Georgia Gkrepi, Konstantinos Kostikas, Athena Gogali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Feasibility of UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Multimodal Diagnostics of Changes in Rat Lungs after Vaping.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos P ExarchosRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Georgia GkrepiRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Konstantinos KostikasRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-3942
Athena GogaliRespiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a rather heterogeneous group of diseases varying in pathophysiology, presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Even though they have been recognized for several years, there are still areas of research debate. In the majority of ILDs, imaging modalities and especially high-resolution Computed Tomography (CT) scans have been the cornerstone in patient diagnostic approach and follow-up. The intricate nature of ILDs and the accompanying data have led to an increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, primarily on imaging data but also in genetic data, spirometry and lung diffusion, among others. In this literature review, we describe the most prominent applications of AI in ILDs presented approximately within the last five years. We roughly stratify these studies in three categories, namely: (i) screening, (ii) diagnosis and classification, (iii) prognosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiffuse parenchymal lung diseasesinterstitial lung diseasesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37443696
PMCPMC10340709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.