Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443645›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

FDG-PET versus Amyloid-PET Imaging for Diagnosis and Response Evaluation in Alzheimer's Disease: Benefits and Pitfalls.

Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim, Tommaso Costa, Kasper P Kepp, Rudolph J Castellani, George Perry, Abass Alavi, Jorge R Barrio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET Image Reconstruction Using Deep Diffusion Image Prior.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's and related dementias: A review and outlook for clinical neuropsychology.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
  12. Alzheimer's Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Poul F Høilund-CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-2367
Mona-Elisabeth RevheimThe Intervention Centre, Division of Technology and Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3300-7420
Tommaso CostaGDS, Department of Psychology, Koelliker Hospital, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-862X
Kasper P KeppSection of Biophysical and Biomedicinal Chemistry, DTU Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Rudolph J CastellaniDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
George PerryDepartment of Neuroscience, Developmental and Regenerative Biology and Genetics of Neurodegeneration, Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-0172
Abass AlaviDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2442-7901
Jorge R BarrioDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Northwestern University · USOslo University Hospital · NOTechnical University of Denmark · DKThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2021, the US Federal Drug and Food Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval for the antibody aducanumab and, in January 2023, also for the antibody lecanemab, based on a perceived drug-induced removal of cerebral amyloid-beta as assessed by amyloid-PET and, in the case of lecanemab, also a presumption of limited clinical efficacy. Approval of the antibody donanemab is awaiting further data. However, published trial data indicate few, small and uncertain clinical benefits, below what is considered "clinically meaningful" and similar to the effect of conventional medication. Furthermore, a therapy-related decrease in the amyloid-PET signal may also reflect increased cell damage rather than simply "amyloid removal". This interpretation is more consistent with increased rates of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities and brain volume loss in treated patients, relative to placebo. We also challenge the current diagnostic criteria for AD based on amyloid-PET imaging biomarkers and recommend that future anti-AD therapy trials apply: (1) diagnosis of AD based on the co-occurrence of cognitive decline and decreased cerebral metabolism assessed by FDA-approved FDG-PET, (2) therapy efficacy determined by favorable effect on cognitive ability, cerebral metabolism by FDG-PET, and brain volumes by MRI, and (3) neuropathologic examination of all deaths occurring in these trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloidamyloid-PETARIAAβFDG-PETMRI

Identifiers

PMID37443645
PMCPMC10341276
OpenAlexW4383068776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.