Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443566›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Imaging Features Following Breast Explant Surgery: A Pictorial Essay.

Yusuf T Akpolat, Mark J Dryden, Marion E Scoggins, Miral M Patel, Ceren Yalniz, Victor J Hassid, Gary J Whitman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuf T AkpolatDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-0597-7422
Mark J DrydenDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Marion E ScogginsDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Miral M PatelDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ceren YalnizDepartment of Radiology Breast Imaging Section, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Victor J HassidDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gary J WhitmanDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-7457
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast implants can be removed with breast explantation surgery (BES) for various reasons, including patient dissatisfaction, capsular contracture, implant infection or rupture, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and a recently emerging phenomenon called breast implant illness. There is very limited data on the imaging appearance after BES. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with BES findings on imaging reports for the period between October 2016 and October 2021. When assessing BES techniques, a key element is determining whether the implant's fibrous capsule requires removal. The second important question is if the patient requires an additional aesthetic procedure after BES. BES techniques include capsulotomy, and partial, total, or en bloc capsulectomy. Adjunctive aesthetic or reconstructive procedures after BES include fat grafting, mastopexy, augmentation, and reconstruction with flaps. The majority of post-BES breast imaging findings are related to the surgical scar/bed, thereby confirming that the type of explantation surgery is important. Imaging findings after BES include focal and global asymmetries, architectural distortions, calcifications, calcified and non-calcified fat necrosis, masses, hematomas, seromas, capsular calcifications, and silicone granulomas. Most importantly, since these patients have residual breast tissue, paying attention to imaging features that are suspicious for breast cancer is necessary.

Indexed as

breast explantation surgerybreast implant illnessbreast implant removalcapsular contractureexplantation findingsimaging findingsimplant rupture

Identifiers

PMID37443566
PMCPMC10340536
OpenAlexW4382467786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.