Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443533›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Application for Classification of Melanomas, Melanocytic Nevi, and Seborrheic Keratoses.

Jokubas Liutkus, Arturas Kriukas, Dominyka Stragyte, Erikas Mazeika, Vidas Raudonis, Wolfgang Galetzka, Andreas Stang, Skaidra Valiukeviciene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jokubas LiutkusDepartment of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Arturas KriukasDepartment of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dominyka StragyteDepartment of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Erikas MazeikaDepartment of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vidas RaudonisArtificial Intelligence Center, Kaunas University of Technology, 51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Wolfgang GaletzkaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, 45130 Essen, Germany.
Andreas StangInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, 45130 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-9061
Skaidra ValiukevicieneDepartment of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEKaunas University of Technology · LT

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG 2535Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba 13.1.1-LMT-K-718-05-0024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current artificial intelligence algorithms can classify melanomas at a level equivalent to that of experienced dermatologists. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of a smartphone-based "You Only Look Once" neural network model for the classification of melanomas, melanocytic nevi, and seborrheic keratoses. The algorithm was trained using 59,090 dermatoscopic images. Testing was performed on histologically confirmed lesions: 32 melanomas, 35 melanocytic nevi, and 33 seborrheic keratoses. The results of the algorithm's decisions were compared with those of two skilled dermatologists and five beginners in dermatoscopy. The algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for melanomas were 0.88 (0.71-0.96) and 0.87 (0.76-0.94), respectively. The algorithm surpassed the beginner dermatologists, who achieved a sensitivity of 0.83 (0.77-0.87). For melanocytic nevi, the algorithm outclassed each group of dermatologists, attaining a sensitivity of 0.77 (0.60-0.90). The algorithm's sensitivity for seborrheic keratoses was 0.52 (0.34-0.69). The smartphone-based "You Only Look Once" neural network model achieved a high sensitivity and specificity in the classification of melanomas and melanocytic nevi with an accuracy similar to that of skilled dermatologists. However, a bigger dataset is required in order to increase the algorithm's sensitivity for seborrheic keratoses.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedermatoscopymelanomanevusseborrheic keratosissmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37443533
PMCPMC10340832
OpenAlexW4381795535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.