ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict COVID‑19 mortality using a dataset including chest computed tomography severity score data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Significance of Computed Tomography Severity Score for Machine Learning Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission in COVID-19 Patients.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Integrating Host Genetics and Clinical Setting in Machine Learning Models: Predicting COVID-19 Prognosis for Healthcare Decision-Making (The FeMiNa Study).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based risk prediction of outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Australia: the AUS-COVID Score.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- AI-derived CT biomarker score for robust COVID-19 mortality prediction across multiple waves and regions using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI Methods Tailored to Influenza, RSV, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2: A Focused Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An investigation into the impact of temporality on COVID-19 infection and mortality predictions: new perspective based on Shapley Values.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Predictive modelling and identification of critical variables of mortality risk in COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-world data-driven early warning system for risk-stratified liver injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients-Machine learning models for clinical decision support.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Predicting Severe Respiratory Failure in Patients with COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The role of Open Access Data in democratizing healthcare AI: A pathway to research enhancement, patient well-being and treatment equity in Andalusia, Spain.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- DFASGCNS: A prognostic model for ovarian cancer prediction based on dual fusion channels and stacked graph convolution.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, new and non-invasive digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) had been introduced for mortality prediction of COVID-19 patients. The prognostic performances of the machine learning (ML)-based models for predicting clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients had been mainly evaluated using demographics, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and laboratory results. There is a lack of information about the prognostic role of imaging manifestations in combination with demographics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory predictors. The purpose of the present study is to develop an efficient ML prognostic model based on a more comprehensive dataset including chest CT severity score (CT-SS). Fifty-five primary features in six main classes were retrospectively reviewed for 6854 suspected cases. The independence test of Chi-square was used to determine the most important features in the mortality prediction of COVID-19 patients. The most relevant predictors were used to train and test ML algorithms. The predictive models were developed using eight ML algorithms including the J48 decision tree (J48), support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), k-nearest neighbourhood (k-NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The performances of the predictive models were evaluated using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) metrics. After applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 815 positive RT-PCR patients were the final sample size, where 54.85% of the patients were male and the mean age of the study population was 57.22 ± 16.76 years. The RF algorithm with an accuracy of 97.2%, the sensitivity of 100%, a precision of 94.8%, specificity of 94.5%, F1-score of 97.3%, and AUC of 99.9% had the best performance. Other ML algorithms with AUC ranging from 81.2 to 93.9% had also good prediction performances in predicting COVID-19 mortality. Results showed that timely and accurate risk stratification of COVID-19 patients could be performed using ML-based predictive models fed by routine data. The proposed algorithm with the more comprehensive dataset including CT-SS could efficiently predict the mortality of COVID-19 patients. This could lead to promptly targeting high-risk patients on admission, the optimal use of hospital resources, and an increased probability of survival of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.