Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Avalanche-size distribution of Cayley tree.

Amikam Patron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amikam PatronDepartment of Mathematics, Jerusalem College of Technology, 91160, Jerusalem, Israel. patron@g.jct.ac.il.
Jerusalem College of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attacks on networks is a very important issue in developing strategies of eradicating spreads of malicious phenomena in networks, such as epidemics and fake information. This field of research is referred to as networks immunization. The traditional approach to evaluating the effectiveness of attacks on networks focuses on measuring macro parameters related to the entire attack, such as the critical probability of a percolation occurrence in the network [Formula: see text] and the relative size of the largest component in the network, known as the giant component, but not considering the attack on a micro perspective, which is the analysis of node removals, during an attack, themselves, their characteristics and results. In this paper we present and apply the last method of focusing on the micro scale of an attack. Based on the theory of percolation in networks, we analyze the phenomenon of an avalanche which results due to a single node removal from a network. An avalanche is a state in which a removal of a single node from the giant component of a network leads to the disconnection of additional nodes. This process significantly contributes to the fragmentation (immunization) of the network, comparing to the impact of the initial node removal alone. Specifically, we focus on the size parameter of an avalanche, which is the number of nodes that are disconnected from the giant component due to a single node removal. Relating to a random attack on a network of the type of Cayley tree, we derive analytically the distribution of the sizes of avalanches that occur during the entire attack on it, until the network is dismantled (immunized) and the attack is terminated.

Indexed as

AvalanchesEpidemicsImmunizationModels, TheoreticalProbability

Identifiers

PMID37443331
PMCPMC10345117
OpenAlexW4384201354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.