Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Training data size and predication errors in the use of machine-learning assisted intraocular lens power calculation.

Hitoshi Tabuchi, Tomofusa Yamauchi, Tomohiro Shojo, Kosuke Takase, Mao Tanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hitoshi TabuchiDepartment of Technology and Design Thinking for Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Tomofusa YamauchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan. T.Yamauchi@tsukazaki-eye.net.
Tomohiro ShojoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Kosuke TakaseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Mao TanabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study examined the effect of the size of training data on the accuracy of machine learning-assisted SRK/T power calculation. Clinical records of 4800 eyes of 4800 Japanese patients with intraocular lenses (IOLs) were reviewed. A support vector regressor (SVR) was used for refining the SRK/T formula, and dataset sizes for training and evaluation were reduced from full to 1/64. The prediction errors from the postoperative refractions were calculated, and the proportion within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D of errors were compared with those using full data. The influence of the difference in A-constant was also evaluated. Prediction errors within ± 0.50 D in the use of full data were obtained with the dataset of ≥ 150 eyes (P = 0.016), whereas the datasets of ≥ 300 eyes were required for the error within ± 0.25 D (P < 0.030). The prediction errors did not alter with the A-constant values among IOLs with open-loop haptics, except for IOLs with plated haptics. In conclusion, the accuracy of SVR-assisted SRK/T could be achieved with the training dataset of ≥ 150 eyes for the Japanese population, and the calculation was versatile for any open-looped IOLs.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationBiometryHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID37443278
PMCPMC10344910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.