ArticleScientific data2023
A multi-omics dataset of human transcriptome and proteome stable reference.
Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications and challenges of biomarker-based predictive models in proactive health management.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-omics integration and clinical validation identify CKAP2 as a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- MicroRNA-Based Triage of HPV-Positive Women Using Liquid-Based Cytology: Diagnostic Performance and Network-Level Insights.Cancers · 2026Article
- Review
- The role and diagnostic value of deregulated miRNAs in cervical cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Modular and cloud-based bioinformatics pipelines for high-confidence biomarker detection in cancer immunotherapy clinical trials.PloS one · 2025Article
- Computational Strategies for Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways: Hepatic Steatosis as a Case Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- TFAM is an autophagy receptor that limits inflammation by binding to cytoplasmic mitochondrial DNA.Nature cell biology · 2024Article
- Integration of Transcriptomics and Lipidomics Profiling to Reveal the Therapeutic Mechanism UnderlyingNutrients · 2023Article
- A multi-omics dataset of human transcriptome and proteome stable reference.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of high-throughput omics technology has greatly promoted the development of biomedicine. However, the poor reproducibility of omics techniques limits their application. It is necessary to use standard reference materials of complex RNAs or proteins to test and calibrate the accuracy and reproducibility of omics workflows. The transcriptome and proteome of most cell lines shift during culturing, which limits their applicability as standard samples. In this study, we demonstrated that the human hepatocellular cell line MHCC97H has a very stable transcriptome (r = 0.983~0.997) and proteome (r = 0.966~0.988 for data-dependent acquisition, r = 0.970~0.994 for data-independent acquisition) after 9 subculturing generations, which allows this steady standard sample to be consistently produced on an industrial scale in long term. Moreover, this stability was maintained across labs and platforms. In sum, our study provides omics standard reference material and reference datasets for transcriptomic and proteomics research. This helps to further standardize the workflow and data quality of omics techniques and thus promotes the application of omics technology in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.