Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443117›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Multi-center study on predicting breast cancer lymph node status from core needle biopsy specimens using multi-modal and multi-instance deep learning.

Yan Ding, Fan Yang, Mengxue Han, Chunhui Li, Yanan Wang, Xin Xu, Min Zhao, Meng Zhao, Meng Yue, Huiyan Deng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yan Ding *Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Fan Yang *AI Lab, Tencent, 518057, Shenzhen, China.
Mengxue Han *Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Chunhui LiDepartment of Pathology, Chengde Medical University Affiliated Hospital, 067000, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Yanan WangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 071000, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Xin XuDepartment of Pathology, Xingtai People's Hospital, 054000, Xingtai, Hebei, China.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, 066000, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.
Meng ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Meng YueDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Huiyan DengDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Huichai YangDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jianhua YaoAI Lab, Tencent, 518057, Shenzhen, China. jianhua.yao@gmail.com.
Yueping LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. annama@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-114X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of our study is to develop a deep learning model based on clinicopathological data and digital pathological image of core needle biopsy specimens for predicting breast cancer lymph node metastasis. We collected 3701 patients from the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and 190 patients from four medical centers in Hebei Province. Integrating clinicopathological data and image features build multi-modal and multi-instance (MMMI) deep learning model to obtain the final prediction. For predicting with or without lymph node metastasis, the AUC was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809 based on the clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI, respectively. For predicting four classification of lymph node status (no metastasis, isolated tumor cells (ITCs), micrometastasis, and macrometastasis), the prediction based on clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI were compared. The AUC for no metastasis was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809, respectively; ITCs were 0.619, 0.531, 0.634, respectively; micrometastasis were 0.636, 0.617, 0.691, respectively; and macrometastasis were 0.748, 0.691, 0.758, respectively. The MMMI model achieved the highest prediction accuracy. For prediction of different molecular types of breast cancer, MMMI demonstrated a better prediction accuracy for any type of lymph node status, especially in the molecular type of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the external validation sets, MMMI also showed better prediction accuracy in the four classification, with AUC of 0.725, 0.757, 0.525, and 0.708, respectively. Finally, we developed a breast cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on a MMMI model. Through all cases tests, the results showed that the overall prediction ability was high.

Identifiers

PMID37443117
PMCPMC10345095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.