ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023
Multi-center study on predicting breast cancer lymph node status from core needle biopsy specimens using multi-modal and multi-instance deep learning.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Generative AI into Nomograms for Breast Cancer Nodal Risk Predictions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A novel model for assessing lymph node metastasis and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer by integrating digital pathology images and transcriptomics.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Deep-learning-based breast cancer stage prediction from H&E-stained whole-slide images in resource-constrained settings.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multimodal fusion for precision diagnosis and personalized management of breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Multimodal AI model for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using whole slide images.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- A comparative study of explainability methods for whole slide classification of lymph node metastases using vision transformers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Out-of-distribution generalization for segmentation of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multimodal diagnostic models and subtype analysis for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Deep learning radiomics based prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of our study is to develop a deep learning model based on clinicopathological data and digital pathological image of core needle biopsy specimens for predicting breast cancer lymph node metastasis. We collected 3701 patients from the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and 190 patients from four medical centers in Hebei Province. Integrating clinicopathological data and image features build multi-modal and multi-instance (MMMI) deep learning model to obtain the final prediction. For predicting with or without lymph node metastasis, the AUC was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809 based on the clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI, respectively. For predicting four classification of lymph node status (no metastasis, isolated tumor cells (ITCs), micrometastasis, and macrometastasis), the prediction based on clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI were compared. The AUC for no metastasis was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809, respectively; ITCs were 0.619, 0.531, 0.634, respectively; micrometastasis were 0.636, 0.617, 0.691, respectively; and macrometastasis were 0.748, 0.691, 0.758, respectively. The MMMI model achieved the highest prediction accuracy. For prediction of different molecular types of breast cancer, MMMI demonstrated a better prediction accuracy for any type of lymph node status, especially in the molecular type of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the external validation sets, MMMI also showed better prediction accuracy in the four classification, with AUC of 0.725, 0.757, 0.525, and 0.708, respectively. Finally, we developed a breast cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on a MMMI model. Through all cases tests, the results showed that the overall prediction ability was high.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.