Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443085›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

MRI for nodal restaging after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer with histopathologic comparison.

Zhiwen Zhang, Yan Chen, Ziqiang Wen, Xuehan Wu, Yutao Que, Yuru Ma, Yunzhu Wu, Quanmeng Liu, Wenjie Fan, Shenping Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiwen Zhang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Yan Chen *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Ziqiang WenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Xuehan WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Yutao QueDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Yuru MaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Yunzhu WuMR Scientific Marketing, SIEMENS Healthineers Ltd, 200124, Shanghai, China.
Quanmeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjie FanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China.
Shenping YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510080, Guangzhou, China. yushp@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5988-781X
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515010796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter neoadjuvant therapy, most of the lymph nodes (LNs) will shrink and disappear in patients with rectal cancer. However, LNs that are still detectable on MRI carry a risk of metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) criterion (short-axis diameter ≥ 5 mm) in diagnosing malignant LNs in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, and whether nodal morphological characteristics (including shape, border, signal homogeneity, and enhancement homogeneity) could improve the diagnostic efficiency for LNs ≥ 5 mm.

methodsThis retrospective study included 90 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and performed preoperative MRI. Two radiologists independently measured the short-axis diameter of LNs and evaluated the morphological characteristics of LNs ≥ 5 mm in consensus. With a per node comparison with histopathology as the reference standard, a ROC curve was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the size criterion. For categorical variables, either a χ

resultsA total of 298 LNs were evaluated. The AUC for nodal size in determining nodal status was 0.81. With a size cutoff value of 5 mm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 65.9%, 87.0%, 46.8%, 93.6% and 83.9%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in any of the morphological characteristics between benign and malignant LNs ≥ 5 mm (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe ESGAR criterion demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance in identifying malignant LNs in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. It was effective in determining the status of LNs < 5 mm but not for LNs ≥ 5 mm, and the diagnostic efficiency could not be improved by considering nodal morphological characteristics.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesHistopathologyLymph nodeMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37443085
PMCPMC10339540
OpenAlexW4384203612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.