ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023
MRI for nodal restaging after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer with histopathologic comparison.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predicting value of post neoadjuvant treatment magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Contrast-enhanced vs T2-weighted MRI for mesorectal nodal staging in rectal cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- A multimodal interpretable deep learning-radiomics framework for predicting lymph node metastasis following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter validation study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Radiological staging clinical decision support model for rectal cancer lymph node metastasis detection on MRI.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- The Role of MRI in Non-Operative Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results Are Concordant with Pathology Staging in Rectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score for mesorectal lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- The Role of Predictive and Prognostic MRI-Based Biomarkers in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based lymph node radiomics for predicting the metastasis of evaluable lymph nodes in rectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- MRI Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Lymph Node Staging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.Cureus · 2023Article
- Comparison of preoperative CT- and MRI-based multiparametric radiomics in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Suspected Locoregional Rectal Cancer Localizations: A Valuable Tool.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfter neoadjuvant therapy, most of the lymph nodes (LNs) will shrink and disappear in patients with rectal cancer. However, LNs that are still detectable on MRI carry a risk of metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) criterion (short-axis diameter ≥ 5 mm) in diagnosing malignant LNs in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, and whether nodal morphological characteristics (including shape, border, signal homogeneity, and enhancement homogeneity) could improve the diagnostic efficiency for LNs ≥ 5 mm.
methodsThis retrospective study included 90 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and performed preoperative MRI. Two radiologists independently measured the short-axis diameter of LNs and evaluated the morphological characteristics of LNs ≥ 5 mm in consensus. With a per node comparison with histopathology as the reference standard, a ROC curve was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the size criterion. For categorical variables, either a χ
resultsA total of 298 LNs were evaluated. The AUC for nodal size in determining nodal status was 0.81. With a size cutoff value of 5 mm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 65.9%, 87.0%, 46.8%, 93.6% and 83.9%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in any of the morphological characteristics between benign and malignant LNs ≥ 5 mm (all P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe ESGAR criterion demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance in identifying malignant LNs in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. It was effective in determining the status of LNs < 5 mm but not for LNs ≥ 5 mm, and the diagnostic efficiency could not be improved by considering nodal morphological characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.