Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443077›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2023

Perceptions of dietary intake amongst Black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups in high-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

Abimbola S Ojo, Lawrence A Nnyanzi, Emma L Giles, Louisa J Ells, Olusegun Awolaran, Sylvester R Okeke, Agani Afaya, Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Abimbola S OjoCentre for Public Health, School of Health & Life Sciences, University of Teesside, Teeside, UK.
Lawrence A NnyanziCentre for Public Health, School of Health & Life Sciences, University of Teesside, Teeside, UK.
Emma L GilesCentre for Public Health, School of Health & Life Sciences, University of Teesside, Teeside, UK.
Louisa J EllsObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Olusegun AwolaranDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Sylvester R OkekeCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Agani AfayaMo-Im Kin Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50‑1, Yonsei‑ro, Seodaemun‑gu, Seoul, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Obasanjo Afolabi BolarinwaDepartment of Public Health, York St John University, London, UK. bolarinwaobasanjo@gmail.com.
Teesside University · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUniversity of Ibadan · NGUNSW Sydney · AUYork St John University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinority ethnic groups are a fast-growing population in many high-income countries, partly due to the increasing population of immigrants and second-generation migrants. The dietary practices of some of these minority ethnic groups might make them to be disproportionately affected by obesity and increase their risks of developing non-communicable diseases. Population-specific interventions and strategies are vital to addressing poor nutritional practices among this population. Thus, this study systematically reviewed the perceptions of dietary intake amongst Black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups in high-income countries.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in line with the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews, using a meta-aggregative design. This systematic review identified and synthesised qualitative literature on the perceptions of dietary intake amongst BlackAsian and other minority  ethnic groups in high-income countries. An extensive and comprehensive database search was conducted between January 2000 - May 2022 and included twenty (20) studies that met the eligibility criteria from six countries. The included studies were assessed for quality using the JBI qualitative assessment and review instrument. The JBI data extraction tools were used to retrieve relevant data from included articles, and the data were thematically analysed.

resultsWe identified eight major themes across this database: (1) "Social and Cultural Factors," (2) "Availability and Accessibility," (3) "Family and Community Influences," (4) "Food Preferences", (5) "Home Country Food Versus Host Country Food" (6) "Dietary Acculturation" (7) "Health and Healthy Eating" (8) "Perception of Nutritional Information."

conclusionOverall, Black, Asian, and other minority ethnic groups individuals were found to be aware of the effects of unhealthy eating on their health, and some of them have nutritional knowledge, but social and cultural factors, including structural factors, were deterrents to their healthy eating behaviours. An important finding from this review is that some participants believed that nutritional information, based on bio-medical science, was intended for only White population groups and that it was antagonistic to their cultural and community well-being.

Indexed as

Asian and other minoritised ethnicitiesBlackDietary intakeHigh-income countriesPerceptionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37443077
PMCPMC10339484
OpenAlexW4384130837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.