Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443008›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Hybridisation has shaped a recent radiation of grass-feeding aphids.

Thomas C Mathers, Roland H M Wouters, Sam T Mugford, Roberto Biello, Cock van Oosterhout, Saskia A Hogenhout

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Real-time genomics for One Health.Molecular systems biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas C MathersDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK. thomas.mathers@jic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-3515
Roland H M WoutersDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2380-4875
Sam T MugfordDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-5578
Roberto BielloDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5916-884X
Cock van OosterhoutSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-738X
Saskia A HogenhoutDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK. saskia.hogenhout@jic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-5606
John Innes Centre · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01227X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9797Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAphids are common crop pests. These insects reproduce by facultative parthenogenesis involving several rounds of clonal reproduction interspersed with an occasional sexual cycle. Furthermore, clonal aphids give birth to live young that are already pregnant. These qualities enable rapid population growth and have facilitated the colonisation of crops globally. In several cases, so-called "super clones" have come to dominate agricultural systems. However, the extent to which the sexual stage of the aphid life cycle has shaped global pest populations has remained unclear, as have the origins of successful lineages. Here, we used chromosome-scale genome assemblies to disentangle the evolution of two global pests of cereals-the English (Sitobion avenae) and Indian (Sitobion miscanthi) grain aphids.

resultsGenome-wide divergence between S. avenae and S. miscanthi is low. Moreover, comparison of haplotype-resolved assemblies revealed that the S. miscanthi isolate used for genome sequencing is likely a hybrid, with one of its diploid genome copies closely related to S. avenae (~ 0.5% divergence) and the other substantially more divergent (> 1%). Population genomics analyses of UK and China grain aphids showed that S. avenae and S. miscanthi are part of a cryptic species complex with many highly differentiated lineages that predate the origins of agriculture. The complex consists of hybrid lineages that display a tangled history of hybridisation and genetic introgression.

conclusionsOur analyses reveal that hybridisation has substantially contributed to grain aphid diversity, and hence, to the evolutionary potential of this important pest species. Furthermore, we propose that aphids are particularly well placed to exploit hybridisation events via the rapid propagation of live-born "frozen hybrids" via asexual reproduction, increasing the likelihood of hybrid lineage formation.

Indexed as

AphidsAnimalsGenomicsPoaceaeReproductionReproduction, AsexualComparative genomicsGenome assemblyInsect crop pestIntrogressionMetopolophium dirhodumPopulation genomicsSitobion avenaeSitobion miscanthi

Identifiers

PMID37443008
PMCPMC10347838
OpenAlexW4384155150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.