Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37443003›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

The impact of emotional support on healthcare workers and students coping with COVID-19, and other SARS-CoV pandemics - a mixed-methods systematic review.

Marja Härkänen, Adriana López Pineda, Susanna Tella, Sanu Mahat, Massimiliano Panella, Matteo Ratti, Kris Vanhaecht, Reinhard Strametz, Irene Carrillo, Anne Marie Rafferty and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06888297 (European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06888297 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims (RESCUE)

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsSecond Victim Phenomenon, Occupational Stress, Healthcare Workforce Well-Being, Patient Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rural healthcare workers' well-being: A systematic review of support interventions.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Marja HärkänenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1c, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8542-8193
Adriana López PinedaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2117-0178
Susanna TellaLAB University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-8852
Sanu MahatDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1c, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-2880
Massimiliano PanellaDepartment of Translational Medicine (DIMET), Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1880-7198
Matteo RattiDepartment of Translational Medicine (DIMET), Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9273-9114
Kris VanhaechtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-4792
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School of RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-8674
Irene CarrilloHealth Psychology Department, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-7284
Anne Marie RaffertyFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-6581
Albert W WuJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-7120
Veli-Jukka AnttilaHelsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-9241
José Joaquín MiraThe Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, Alicante, Spain. jose.mira@umh.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-083X
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIJohns Hopkins University · USKing's College London · GBKU Leuven · BELAB University of Applied Sciences · FIRheinMain University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPandemics such as COVID-19 pose threats to the physical safety of healthcare workers and students. They can have traumatic experiences affecting their personal and professional life. Increasing rates of burnout, substance abuse, depression, and suicide among healthcare workers have already been identified, thus making mental health and psychological wellbeing of the healthcare workers a major issue. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the characteristics of emotional support programs and interventions targeted to healthcare workers and students since the onset of COVID-19 and other SARS-CoV pandemics and to describe the effectiveness and experiences of these programs.

methodThis was a mixed method systematic review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the review was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42021262837]. Searches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The COVIDENCE systematic review management system was used for data selection and extraction by two independent reviewers. The JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of selected studies by two additional reviewers. Finally, data extraction and narrative analysis were conducted.

resultsThe search retrieved 3161 results including 1061 duplicates. After screening, a total of 19 articles were included in this review. Participants in studies were nurses, physicians, other hospital staff, and undergraduate medical students mostly working on the front-line with COVID-19 patients. Publications included RCTs (n = 4), quasi-experimental studies (n = 2), cross-sectional studies (n = 6), qualitative interview studies (n = 3), and systematic reviews (n = 4). Most (63.4%) of the interventions used online or digital solutions. Interventions mostly showed good effectiveness (support-seeking, positive emotions, reduction of distress symptoms etc.) and acceptance and were experienced as helpful, but there were some conflicting results.

conclusionHealthcare organizations have developed support strategies focusing on providing emotional support for these healthcare workers and students, but it is difficult to conclude whether one program offers distinct benefit compared to the others. More research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of emotional support interventions for health workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusAdaptation, PsychologicalCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsStudentsCOVID-19EmotionalHealthcareResilienceSARSSecond victimSupportSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37443003
PMCPMC10339499
OpenAlexW4384201430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.