Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2023
Evaluation of the better operative outcome software tool to predict cataract surgical outcome in the early postoperative follow-up.
Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCataracts are the world's leading cause of avoidable blindness. In low-income countries, there are high rates of poor follow-up, which makes it very difficult to monitor surgical outcomes. To address this issue, the Better Operative Outcome Software Tool (BOOST Cataract app) predicts outcome on the first postoperative day and provides specific advice to improve outcomes. The aim of the study is to evaluate the ability of the BOOST Cataract app to categorise surgical outcomes and to analyse the possible factors that contribute to its performance. This was a prospective observational study performed at the General Hospital of Hospitalet of Llobregat.
resultsA total of 126 cataracts were included. Patients had a mean [SD] age of 75.8 [12.19] years, and 52% were females. Manual small-incision cataract surgery was involved in 57% and phacoemulsification in 43%. Thirty-eight percent of eyes presented significant corneal oedema on day 1. The BOOST Cataract app succeeded in categorising the final outcome in 65.6% of the eyes and in 93,4% of the eyes with good outcome.The agreement between the BOOST and UDVA outcomes was 0.353 (p< .000). The level of agreement improved to 0.619 (p< .000) in eyes with clear corneas. Success obtained by BOOST for both types of surgery was not statistically different. Eyes that obtained a good outcome on day one after surgery and eyes with clear cornea had 37 times higher odds (95% CI 6.66, 212.83) and 12 times higher odds (95% CI 3.13, 47.66) of being correctly categorised by the BOOST Cataract app than eyes that obtained a suboptimal (moderate and poor) outcome and eyes with corneal oedema on day 1.
conclusionsThe BOOST Cataract app is an e-Health tool designed to address issues of measuring quality in low- and middle-income settings. Although its reliability is limited to eyes that obtain a good outcome and with clear corneas on day 1, the use of the tool on a regular basis facilitates monitoring and reporting outcomes when clinical data collection is challenging due to low postoperative follow-up rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.