Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442679›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2023

Intellectual cyborgs and the future of science.

Agustin Ibanez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Walking the talk for dementia: A unique immersive, embodied, and multi-experiential initiative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  5. The Brain Economy: Advancing Brain Science to Better Understand the Modern Economy.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Agustin IbanezGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), CA, USA; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland; Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: agustin.ibanez@gbhi.org.

Funding

US-South American Initiative for Genetic-Neural-Behavioral Interactions in Human Neurodegenerative ResearchR01AG057234 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Agustin M. Ibanez · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike classical artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI has the potential to transform scientists into intellectual cyborgs. Leveraging embodied cognition and extended mind theories can help us understand this scientific revolution. Despite ethical concerns, generative AI can enhance research efficiency and accessibility. However, this requires unprecedented proactive regulation and responsible development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCognitionForecastingHumansembodied cognitionextended mindgenerative AIintellectual cyborgsscientific regulationscientific revolutions

Identifiers

PMID37442679
PMCPMC11181816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.