Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442671›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2023

Machine learning for abdominal aortic calcification assessment from bone density machine-derived lateral spine images.

Naeha Sharif, Syed Zulqarnain Gilani, David Suter, Siobhan Reid, Pawel Szulc, Douglas Kimelman, Barret A Monchka, Mohammad Jafari Jozani, Jonathan M Hodgson, Marc Sim and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Automated abdominal aortic calcification and trabecular bone score independently predict incident fracture during routine osteoporosis screening.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Machine learning is changing osteoporosis detection: an integrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  10. Automated abdominal aortic calcification and major adverse cardiovascular events in people undergoing osteoporosis screening: the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Machine-Learning Assessed Abdominal Aortic Calcification is Associated with Long-Term Fall and Fracture Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Australian Women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Naeha SharifNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Centre for AI&ML, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Syed Zulqarnain GilaniNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Centre for AI&ML, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
David SuterNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Centre for AI&ML, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Siobhan ReidDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Pawel SzulcINSERM UMR 1033, University of Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Douglas KimelmanDepartment of Radiology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Barret A MonchkaGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Mohammad Jafari JozaniDepartment of Statistics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jonathan M HodgsonNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Marc SimNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Kun ZhuMedical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Douglas P KielHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard L PrinceNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
John T SchousboePark Nicollet Clinic and HealthPartners Institute, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, USA; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
William D LeslieDepartments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Joshua R LewisNutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: joshua.lewis@ecu.edu.au.
Edith Cowan University · AUUniversity of Manitoba · CABeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CAThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral spine images for vertebral fracture assessment can be easily obtained on modern bone density machines. Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) can be scored on these images by trained imaging specialists to assess cardiovascular disease risk. However, this process is laborious and requires careful training.

methodsTraining and testing of model performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm for automated AAC-24 scoring utilised 5012 lateral spine images (2 manufacturers, 4 models of bone density machines), with trained imaging specialist AAC scores. Validation occurred in a registry-based cohort study of 8565 older men and women with images captured as part of routine clinical practice for fracture risk assessment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between machine-learning AAC (ML-AAC-24) scores with future incident Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) that including death, hospitalised acute myocardial infarction or ischemic cerebrovascular disease ascertained from linked healthcare data.

findingsThe average intraclass correlation coefficient between imaging specialist and ML-AAC-24 scores for 5012 images was 0.84 (95% CI 0.83, 0.84) with classification accuracy of 80% for established AAC groups. During a mean follow-up 4 years in the registry-based cohort, MACE outcomes were reported in 1177 people (13.7%). With increasing ML-AAC-24 scores there was an increasing proportion of people with MACE (low 7.9%, moderate 14.5%, high 21.2%), as well as individual MACE components (all p-trend <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, moderate and high ML-AAC-24 groups remained significantly associated with MACE (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31-1.80 & HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.75-2.42, respectively), compared to those with low ML-AAC-24.

interpretationThe ML-AAC-24 scores had substantial levels of agreement with trained imaging specialists, and was associated with a substantial gradient of risk for cardiovascular events in a real-world setting. This approach could be readily implemented into these clinical settings to improve identification of people at high CVD risk.

fundingThe study was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Ideas grant and the Rady Innovation Fund, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba.

Indexed as

Aortic DiseasesBone DensityVascular CalcificationAorta, AbdominalHumansSpinal FracturesSupervised Machine LearningAortovascular diseaseCardiovascular diseaseDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryMachine learningVascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID37442671
PMCPMC10435763
OpenAlexW4383957477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.