Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442593›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Somatostatin Receptor-PET/CT/MRI of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Tumors.

J N Rini, G Keir, C Caravella, A Goenka, A M Franceschi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Brain Tumor Imaging Beyond [AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J N RiniFrom the Nuclear Medicine Division (J.N.R., G.K., C.C.), Department of Radiology.ORCID 0009-0003-1173-8035
G KeirFrom the Nuclear Medicine Division (J.N.R., G.K., C.C.), Department of Radiology.ORCID 0000-0001-7597-8378
C CaravellaFrom the Nuclear Medicine Division (J.N.R., G.K., C.C.), Department of Radiology.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-2658
A GoenkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology (A.G.), Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1946-2307
A M FranceschiNeuroradiology Division (A.M.F.), Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York afranceschi@northwell.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-9738
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission · USHofstra University · USLenox Hill Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDue to its high sensitivity, somatostatin receptor-PET may detect smaller lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging, while the superior spatial resolution of MR imaging enables lesions to be accurately localized. We compared results of somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI with those of MR imaging alone and assessed the added value of vertex-to-thigh imaging for head and neck neuroendocrine tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsSomatostatin receptor-PET/CT was acquired as limited brain or head and neck imaging, with optional vertex-to-thigh imaging, following administration of

resultsThirty patients (with 13 meningiomas, 11 paragangliomas, 1 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma, 1 middle ear neuroendocrine adenoma, 1 external auditory canal mass, 1 pituitary carcinoma, 1 olfactory neuroblastoma, 1 orbital mass) were imaged. Five had no evidence of somatostatin receptor-positive lesions and were excluded. In 11/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI and MR imaging were comparable. In 7/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI showed more extensive disease, while in 9/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI identified additional lesions. On vertex-to-thigh imaging, 1 of 17 patients was positive for metastatic disease, 8 of 17 were negative, and 8 of 17 demonstrated incidental findings.

conclusionsSomatostatin receptor-PET detected additional lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone, while vertex-to-thigh imaging showed a low incidence of metastatic disease. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI enabled superior anatomic delineation of tumor burden, while any discrepancies were readily addressed. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI has the potential to play an important role in presurgical and radiation therapy planning of head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsNose NeoplasmsOrganometallic CompoundsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNasal CavityPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReceptors, SomatostatinOrganometallic CompoundsReceptors, Somatostatin

Identifiers

PMID37442593
PMCPMC10411831
OpenAlexW4384197789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.