Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442592›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Ecchordosis Physaliphora: Does It Even Exist?

A R Stevens, B F Branstetter, P Gardner, T M Pearce, G A Zenonos, K Arani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Primary malignant bone tumours-part II].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clival and paraclival pathologies: imaging features and differential diagnosis.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

A R StevensFrom the Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (A.R.S.), Erie, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-9199
B F BranstetterDepartments of Radiology (B.F.B., K.A.) BFB1@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-6909
P GardnerNeurosurgery (P.G., G.A.Z.).ORCID 0000-0002-1594-1722
T M PearcePathology (T.M.P.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-9492
G A ZenonosNeurosurgery (P.G., G.A.Z.).ORCID 0000-0001-9532-4160
K AraniDepartments of Radiology (B.F.B., K.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-8864-9944
GfK (United States) · USBaidya and Banskota Hospital · NPLake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity Radiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term ecchordosis physaliphora (EP) has been used historically to describe a benign notochordal remnant with no growth potential, most commonly occuring in the central clivus. Unfortunately, the radiologic appearance of EP overlaps considerably with the appearance of low-grade chordomas, which do have the potential for growth. In this article, we review new pathologic terminology that better describes this family of diseases, and we propose new radiologic terms that better address the uncertainty of the radiologic diagnosis. The surgical importance of accurate terminology and the implications for patient care are discussed.

Indexed as

Cerebellar VermisChordomaCranial Fossa, PosteriorHumansNotochord

Identifiers

PMID37442592
PMCPMC10411852
OpenAlexW4384132446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.