Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442583›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Rectus sheath catheters reduce opiate use in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pre- and postintervention cohort study.

Patrick L C Tapley, Martin Van der Vyver, Natalie G Coburn, Julie Hallet, Calvin Law, Rachel Roke, Paul J Karanicolas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick L C TapleyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Martin Van der VyverDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Natalie G CoburnDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Julie HalletDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Calvin LawDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Rachel RokeDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley).
Paul J KaranicolasDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Tapley [during the conduct of the study], Van der Vyver); Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Coburn, Hallet, Law, Roke, Karanicolas); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (Tapley) paul.karanicolas@sunnybrook.ca.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy is the only curative option for patients with pancreatic cancer; however, pain remains a considerable problem postoperatively. With many centres moving away from using epidural analgesia, there is the need to evaluate alternative opiate sparing techniques for postoperative analgesia. We sought to determine if rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) had an opiate sparing and analgesic effect compared with standard care alone (opiate analgesia).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective pre- and postintervention cohort study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single tertiary academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, between April 2018 and December 2019. All patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion. Among the 101 patients identified, 84 (61 control, 23 RSCs) were analyzed after exclusion criteria were applied (epidural analgesia, admission to intensive care intubated or reintubated within the first 96 hours). The pre-intervention group received a semi-standardized course of analgesics, including intravenous hydromorphone, acetaminophen, ketamine, with or without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and with or without intravenous lidocaine; the latter 2 drugs were at the individual anesthesiologist and surgeon's preference. For the postintervention group, the same course of analgesics were used, with the addition of RSCs. These were inserted at the end of the operation, with a loading dose of ropivacaine administered and followed by a programmed intermittent bolus regime for 72-96 hours. The primary outcome measure was total postoperative opiate consumption (oral morphine equivalents). Secondary outcomes included pain scores (numeric rating scale) and treatment-related adverse effects.

resultsOpiate consumption (oral morphine equivalents) at 96 hours was significantly lower (median 188 mg, interquartile range [IQR] 112-228 v. 242.4 mg, IQR 166.8-352) with and without RSC, respectively (

conclusionThe use of RSCs was associated with significant reductions in postoperative opiate consumption. Given the ease of placement and management, with minimal complications, RSCs should be incorporated into a course of postoperative multimodal analgesia. A large scale randomized controlled trial should be conducted to further investigate these findings.

Indexed as

Opiate AlkaloidsAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCathetersCohort StudiesHumansMorphinePancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineOpiate Alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID37442583
PMCPMC10355997
OpenAlexW4384200002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.