Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37442577›Full record

ArticleGenome research2023

Genome skimming with nanopore sequencing precisely determines global and transposon DNA methylation in vertebrates.

Christopher Faulk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher FaulkDepartment of Animal Science, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA cfaulk@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-9658
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Linking evolution to aging through DNA methylation and CpG density by examining twelve mammalian speciesR21AG071908 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FAULK, CHRISTOPHER, MCLAIN, ADAM T · 2022 to 2023
$439k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG071908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome skimming is defined as low-pass sequencing below 0.05× coverage and is typically used for mitochondrial genome recovery and species identification. Long-read nanopore sequencers enable simultaneous reading of both DNA sequence and methylation and can multiplex samples for low-cost genome skimming. Here I present nanopore sequencing as a highly precise platform for global DNA methylation and transposon assessment. At coverage of just 0.001×, or 30 Mb of reads, accuracy is sub-1%. Biological and technical replicates validate high precision. Skimming 40 vertebrate species reveals conserved patterns of global methylation consistent with whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and an average mapping rate >97%. Genome size directly correlates to global DNA methylation, explaining 39% of its variance. Accurate SINE and LINE transposon methylation in both the mouse and primates can be obtained with just 0.0001× coverage, or 3 Mb of reads. Sample multiplexing, field portability, and the low price of this instrument combine to make genome skimming for DNA methylation an accessible method for epigenetic assessment from ecology to epidemiology and for low-resource groups.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNanopore SequencingAnimalsGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMiceSequence Analysis, DNAVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID37442577
PMCPMC10519409
OpenAlexW4384199367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.