Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441879›Full record

ArticleHearing research2023

Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses.

Can Xu, Fan-Yin Cheng, Sarah Medina, Erica Eng, René Gifford, Spencer Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Can XuDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin 78712-0114, TX, USA.
Fan-Yin ChengDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin 78712-0114, TX, USA.
Sarah MedinaDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin 78712-0114, TX, USA.
Erica EngDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin 78712-0114, TX, USA.
René GiffordDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Spencer SmithDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2504A Whitis Ave. (A1100), Austin 78712-0114, TX, USA. Electronic address: spencer.smith@austin.utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Binaural cue sensitivity in children and adults with combined electric and acoustic stimulationR01DC020194 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Rene H Gifford · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Investigating the Relationship between Objective Measures of Binaural Hearing and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Middle-Aged ListenersK01DC017192 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SMITH, SPENCER · 2018 to 2020
$411k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC017192NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bimodal hearing, in which a contralateral hearing aid is combined with a cochlear implant (CI), provides greater speech recognition benefits than using a CI alone. Factors predicting individual bimodal patient success are not fully understood. Previous studies have shown that bimodal benefits may be driven by a patient's ability to extract fundamental frequency (f0) and/or temporal fine structure cues (e.g., F1). Both of these features may be represented in frequency following responses (FFR) to bimodal speech. Thus, the goals of this study were to: 1) parametrically examine neural encoding of f0 and F1 in simulated bimodal speech conditions; 2) examine objective discrimination of FFRs to bimodal speech conditions using machine learning; 3) explore whether FFRs are predictive of perceptual bimodal benefit. Three vowels (/ε/, /i/, and /ʊ/) with identical f0 were manipulated by a vocoder (right ear) and low-pass filters (left ear) to create five bimodal simulations for evoking FFRs: Vocoder-only, Vocoder +125 Hz, Vocoder +250 Hz, Vocoder +500 Hz, and Vocoder +750 Hz. Perceptual performance on the BKB-SIN test was also measured using the same five configurations. Results suggested that neural representation of f0 and F1 FFR components were enhanced with increasing acoustic bandwidth in the simulated "non-implanted" ear. As spectral differences between vowels emerged in the FFRs with increased acoustic bandwidth, FFRs were more accurately classified and discriminated using a machine learning algorithm. Enhancement of f0 and F1 neural encoding with increasing bandwidth were collectively predictive of perceptual bimodal benefit on a speech-in-noise task. Given these results, FFR may be a useful tool to objectively assess individual variability in bimodal hearing.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing AidsSpeech PerceptionHumansSpeechBimodal benefitsCochlear implantsFrequency following responsesHearing aidsMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37441879
PMCPMC12892297
OpenAlexW4383671789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.