Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441712›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2023

Novel grading system for CADASIL severity: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Bhrugun Anisetti, Elena Greco, Eldina Stojadinovic, Eric D Goldstein, Amra Sakusic, Mohammed K Badi, Michael D Liu, Michelle P Lin, Chia-Chun Chiang, Fanny M Elahi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Bhrugun AnisettiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Elena GrecoDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Eldina StojadinovicDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Eric D GoldsteinDepartment of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Amra SakusicDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mohammed K BadiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Michael D LiuDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michelle P LinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Chia-Chun ChiangDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Fanny M ElahiDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Bradford B WorrallDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Derek PetrosianDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Owen RossMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
James F MeschiaDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
WinnMed · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Virginia · USBrown University · USJacksonville College · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited progressive cerebral microangiopathy with considerable phenotypic variability. The purpose of this study was to describe the generalizability of a recently proposed grading system of CADASIL across multiple centers in the United States. Methods: Electronic medical records (EMR) of an initial neurological assessment of adult patients with confirmed CADASIL were reviewed across 5 tertiary referral medical centers with expertise in CADASIL. Demographic, vascular risk factors, and neuroimaging data were abstracted from EMR. Patients were categorized into groups according to the proposed CADASIL grading system: Grade 0 (asymptomatic), Grade 1 (migraine only), Grade 2 (stroke, TIA, or MCI), Grade 3 (gait assistance or dementia), and Grade 4 (bedbound or end-stage). Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of grading was tested in a subset of cases. Results: We identified 138 patients with a mean age of 50.9 ± 13.1 years, and 57.2% were female. The IRR was acceptable over 33 cases (κ=0.855, SD 0.078, Conclusion: The CADASIL severity grading system is a pragmatic, reliable system for characterizing CADASIL phenotype that does not require testing beyond that done in standard clinical practice. Higher severity grades tended to have a higher vascular risk factor burden. This system offers a simple method of categorizing CADASIL patients which may help to describe populations in observational and interventional studies.

Indexed as

CADASILGrading systemMulticenter

Identifiers

PMID37441712
PMCPMC10333271
OpenAlexW4380269394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.