Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Rapid, sensitive, and highly specific detection of monkeypox virus by CRISPR-based diagnostic platform.

Lin Gong, Xiaomin Chen, Yimei Wang, Jiansheng Liang, Xiaoli Liu, Yi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Therapeutic Innovations for Monkeypox Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mpox disease, diagnosis, and point of care platforms.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mpox: transmission dynamics, treatment, and innovations.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin Gong *Department of Disinfection and Pest Control, Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaomin Chen *Department of Disinfection and Pest Control, Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yimei WangDepartment of Disinfection and Pest Control, Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiansheng LiangDepartment of Disinfection and Pest Control, Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaoli LiuDepartment of Disinfection and Pest Control, Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yi WangExperimental Research Center, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Capital Institute of Pediatrics · CNWuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Monkeypox (MPX), caused by the Monkeypox virus (MPXV), has incurred global attention since it broke out in many countries in recent times, which highlights the need for rapid and reliable diagnosis of MPXV infection. Methods: We combined recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection to devise a diagnostic test for detection of MPXV and differentiation of its two clades [Central Africa clade (MPXV-CA) and West Africa clade (MPXV-WA)], and called it MPXV-RCC. The sensitivity, specificity and practicability of this method have been analyzed. Results: The optimal conditions of MPXV-RCC assay include two RPA reactions at 38°C for 25 min and a CRISPR/Cas12a-gRNA detection at 37°C for 10 min. The results of MPXV-RCC assay were indicated by a real-time fluorescence analysis software. Thus, the whole detection process, including rapid template preparation (20 min), RPA reaction (25 min) and CRISPR-based detection (10 min), could be finished within 1 hour. The sensitivity of MPXV-RCC for MPXV-CA and MPXV-WA detection was down to 5~10 copies of recombination plasmids and pseudovirus per reaction. Particularly, MPXV-RCC assay could clearly differentiate MPXV-CA from MPXV-WA, and had no cross-reactivity with other pathogens. In addition, the feasibility of MPXV-RCC assay was further validated by using spiked clinical samples. Conclusion: The MPXV-RCC assay developed here is a promising tool for quick and reliable diagnosis of MPXV infection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMpox, MonkeypoxHumansMonkeypox virusCRISPR/Cas12amonkeypoxmonkeypox virusMPXV-RCCRPA

Identifiers

PMID37441636
PMCPMC10335395
OpenAlexW4382467011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.