ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Migraine with aura detection and subtype classification using machine learning algorithms and morphometric magnetic resonance imaging data.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning Classification of Migraine Using fNIRS During a Postural Task.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Investigating the Role of the Hippocampus in Migraine with Aura.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Pharmacological Treatment Response in Migraine Using AI/ML: A Scoping Review of the Evidence and Future Directions.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Review
- Clinical Prediction of Posttreatment Migraine Recurrence Using Biofeedback Data: A Machine Learning Framework for Enhanced Patient Stratification and Treatment Monitoring.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Cortical network dysfunction in migraine: linking genes, metabolism and clinical disability.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Biological Markers of Brain Network Connectivity and Pain Sensitivity Distinguish Low Coping from High Coping Veterans with Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Observational
- A robust multimodal brain MRI-based diagnostic model for migraine: validation across different migraine phases and longitudinal follow-up data.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members' vision - part 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Subsegmentation of the hippocampus in subgroups of migraine with aura patients: advanced structural neuroimaging study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members' vision - part 1.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Headache Disorder Diagnosis, Classification, and Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Migraine aura discrimination using machine learning: an fMRI study during ictal and interictal periods.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Migraine headache (MH) classification using machine learning methods with data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in Migraine.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Machine learning approach for Migraine Aura Complexity Score prediction based on magnetic resonance imaging data.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Article
- Multilayer network changes in patients with migraine.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Migraine Aura-Catch Me If You Can with EEG and MRI-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Migraine with aura (MwA) is a neurological condition manifested in moderate to severe headaches associated with transient visual and somatosensory symptoms, as well as higher cortical dysfunctions. Considering that about 5% of the world's population suffers from this condition and manifestation could be abundant and characterized by various symptoms, it is of great importance to focus on finding new and advanced techniques for the detection of different phenotypes, which in turn, can allow better diagnosis, classification, and biomarker validation, resulting in tailored treatments of MwA patients. Methods: This research aimed to test different machine learning techniques to distinguish healthy people from those suffering from MwA, as well as people with simple MwA and those experiencing complex MwA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) post-processed data (cortical thickness, cortical surface area, cortical volume, cortical mean Gaussian curvature, and cortical folding index) was collected from 78 subjects [46 MwA patients (22 simple MwA and 24 complex MwA) and 32 healthy controls] with 340 different features used for the algorithm training. Results: The results show that an algorithm based on post-processed MRI data yields a high classification accuracy (97%) of MwA patients and precise distinction between simple MwA and complex MwA with an accuracy of 98%. Additionally, the sets of features relevant to the classification were identified. The feature importance ranking indicates the thickness of the left temporal pole, right lingual gyrus, and left pars opercularis as the most prominent markers for MwA classification, while the thickness of left pericalcarine gyrus and left pars opercularis are proposed as the two most important features for the simple and complex MwA classification. Discussion: This method shows significant potential in the validation of MwA diagnosis and subtype classification, which can tackle and challenge the current treatments of MwA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.