ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023
AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-ancestry and cross-disorder transferability of polygenic risk scores for obsessive-compulsive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: from molecular data analysis to clinical decision-making.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- Insights from GWAS, TWAS, and DEG analysis: CDKN2B-AS1, MAP3K4, and P2RX2-encoded P2X2 receptor identified as potential therapeutic targets for ischemic heart disease in Russian adults and long-living individuals.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Multiple polygenic score approach in colorectal cancer risk prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current AI technologies in cancer diagnostics and treatment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Bridging Genomics to Cardiology Clinical Practice: Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing Polygenic Risk Scores: A Systematic Review.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based polygenic scores enhance generalizability of psychiatric disorders prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Data simulation to optimize frameworks for genome-wide association studies in diverse populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Polygenic Risk Score-Based Association Analysis Identifies Genetic Comorbidities Associated with Age-Related Hearing Difficulty in Two Independent Samples.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
- Machine learning and phylogenetic analysis allow for predicting antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculate the risk for a specific disease based on the weighted sum of associated alleles from different genetic loci in the germline estimated by regression models. Recent advances in genetics made it possible to create polygenic predictors of complex human traits, including risks for many important complex diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases, typically influenced by many genetic variants, each of which has a negligible effect on overall risk. In the current study, we analyzed whether adding additional PRS from other diseases to the prediction models and replacing the regressions with machine learning models can improve overall predictive performance. Results showed that multi-PRS models outperform single-PRS models significantly on different diseases. Moreover, replacing regression models with machine learning models, i.e., deep learning, can also improve overall accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.