Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441514›Full record

ReviewFood & nutrition research2023

Intake of vitamin B12 in relation to vitamin B12 status in groups susceptible to deficiency: a systematic review.

Linnea Bärebring, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, Birna Thorisdottir, Alfons Ramel, Fredrik Söderlund, Erik Kristoffer Arnesen, Bright I Nwaru, Jutta Dierkes, Agneta Åkesson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food & nutrition research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vitamin BFood & nutrition research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Linnea BärebringDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christel Lamberg-AllardtDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Birna ThorisdottirFaculty of Sociology, Anthropology and Folkloristics and Health Science Institute, University of Iceland, Iceland.
Alfons RamelFaculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Iceland, Iceland.
Fredrik SöderlundUnit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, the Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Erik Kristoffer ArnesenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Bright I NwaruKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jutta DierkesCentre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.
Agneta ÅkessonUnit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, the Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Iceland · ISHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the evidence for whether habitual or different levels of experimental intake of vitamin B12 from diet and supplements is sufficient to ensure adequate B12 status in groups most susceptible to vitamin B12 deficiency. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus up to 21 May 2021, for intervention studies, prospective cohort studies and case-control studies assessing B12 intake from diet and/or supplements in relation to B12 status (s/p-B12, holotranscobalamin, methylmalonic acid, homocysteine or breastmilk B12). Cross-sectional studies were eligible for studies conducted during pregnancy and lactation. Included populations were children (0-18 years), young adults (18-35 years), pregnant or lactating women, older adults (≥65 years) and vegans or vegetarians. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two assessors independently. The evidence was synthesized qualitatively and classified according to the World Cancer Research Fund. Results: The searches yielded 4855 articles of which 89 were assessed in full text and 18 included. Three studies were conducted during pregnancy and three during lactation or infancy - all observational. Eight studies were conducted among older adults; most were interventions among B12-deficient participants. Four studies were eligible for vegetarian and vegans, all interventions. The strength of evidence that habitual B12 intake or an intake in line with the current Nordic recommended intake (RI) is sufficient to ensure adequate status was considered Conclusion: Evidence is insufficient to assess if or which level of B12 intake is sufficient to maintain adequate status for all included populations. Population-based cohort studies and low-to-moderate dose interventions that address this question are highly warranted.

Indexed as

cobalamindietary guidelinesholotranscobalaminhomocysteinemethylmalonic acidvitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID37441514
PMCPMC10335093
OpenAlexW4382753526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.