ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Repair Failure and Reliability of the Rotator Cuff Healing Index (RoHI) in Thai Patients: Comparison of the RoHI With a Modified Scoring System.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Postoperative Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair in Tobacco and Nontobacco Nicotine Users.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors for Repair Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Biologic augmentation in rotator cuff repair: current evidence and future directions.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Structural healing after rotator cuff repair: clinical predictors, biomarkers, prediction models, and readiness for precision care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Bioaugmentation of Rotator Cuff Repair With an Interpositional Nanofiber Scaffold.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Medicaid Patients Have Similar Functional Patient Outcomes but Lower Mental Health Scores Than Patients With Private Insurance Following Rotator Cuff Repair.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Augmentation Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repairs.JBJS reviews · 2025Review
- Predicting Major Preoperative Risk Factors for Retears After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Rotator cuff tears.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The success rate of surgical treatment for rotator cuff (RC) tear ranges from 16% to 94%. The Rotator Cuff Healing Index (RoHI) is a system for predicting failure after RC repair and is based on a combined score of factors, including age, anteroposterior (AP) tear size, tendon retraction, fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle, bone mineral density (BMD), and level of work activity. Purpose: To determine the factors leading to RC repair failure in a Thai population, to test the reliability of the RoHI in this population, and to compare the RoHI with a modified RoHI (m-RoHI) based on the factors for repair failure as determined. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 133 Thai patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair between February 2012 and February 2021. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 6 to 24 months to evaluate RC healing. Variables that might affect failure rates were evaluated, including demographic characteristics, AP tear size and retraction, radiographic measurements, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. The m-RoHI was created using factors that significantly predicted repair failure on multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to determine the reliability of the RoHI and to compare the reliability of the RoHI and m-RoHI to predict failure rates. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index ≥23 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 9.02; Conclusion: The m-RoHI had a similar predictive value for repair failure to the original RoHI in our study population, but it did not require obtaining BMD. The m-RoHI may be useful in populations where BMD is not routinely obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.