Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441494›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Dysbiosis signatures of gut microbiota and the progression of type 2 diabetes: a machine learning approach in a Mexican cohort.

Daniel Neri-Rosario, Yoscelina Estrella Martínez-López, Diego A Esquivel-Hernández, Jean Paul Sánchez-Castañeda, Cristian Padron-Manrique, Aarón Vázquez-Jiménez, David Giron-Villalobos, Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel Neri-RosarioHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Yoscelina Estrella Martínez-LópezHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Diego A Esquivel-HernándezHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Jean Paul Sánchez-CastañedaHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Cristian Padron-ManriqueHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Aarón Vázquez-JiménezHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
David Giron-VillalobosHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.
Osbaldo Resendis-AntonioHuman Systems Biology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis is one of the causal factors for the progression of different chronic metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Understanding the basis that laid this association may lead to developing new therapeutic strategies for preventing and treating T2D, such as probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplants. It may also help identify potential early detection biomarkers and develop personalized interventions based on an individual's gut microbiota profile. Here, we explore how supervised Machine Learning (ML) methods help to distinguish taxa for individuals with prediabetes (prediabetes) or T2D. Methods: To this aim, we analyzed the GM profile (16s rRNA gene sequencing) in a cohort of 410 Mexican naïve patients stratified into normoglycemic, prediabetes, and T2D individuals. Then, we compared six different ML algorithms and found that Random Forest had the highest predictive performance in classifying T2D and prediabetes patients versus controls. Results: We identified a set of taxa for predicting patients with T2D compared to normoglycemic individuals, including Discussion: These findings allow us to postulate that GM is a distinctive signature in prediabetes and T2D patients during the development and progression of the disease. Our study highlights the role of GM and opens a window toward the rational design of new preventive and personalized strategies against the control of this disease.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePrediabetic StateDysbiosisHumansMachine LearningRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sdysbiosisexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningMexican patientsmicrobiotaSHAP valuetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37441494
PMCPMC10333697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.