Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?

Kai Yi Wu, Sarah Parent, Lingyu Xu, Maryam Yaqoob, W Allan Black, Andrea Shysh, John R Mackey, Karen King, Harald Becher, Edith Pituskin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai Yi WuMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Sarah ParentRoyal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Lingyu XuCardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Maryam YaqoobMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
W Allan BlackFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrea ShyshMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
John R MackeyCross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Karen KingCross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Harald BecherMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Edith PituskinFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
D Ian PatersonUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University of Alberta · CARoyal University Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many patients with breast cancer receive therapies with the potential to cause cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography and multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans are the most used modalities to assess cardiac function during treatment in high-risk patients; however, the optimal imaging strategy and the impact on outcome are unknown. Methods: Consecutive patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing pre-treatment echocardiography or MUGA were identified from a tertiary care cancer center from 2010-2019. Demographics, medical history, imaging data and clinical events were collected from hospital charts and administrative databases. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause death or heart failure event. Clinical and imaging predictors of outcome were evaluated on univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: 1028 patients underwent pre-treatment MUGA and 1032 underwent echocardiography. The groups were well matched for most clinical characteristics except patients undergoing MUGA were younger, had more stage 3 breast cancer and more HER2 over-expressing and triple negative cases. Routine follow-up cardiac imaging scan was obtained in 39.3% of patients with MUGA and 38.0% with echocardiography. During a median follow-up of 2448 (1489, 3160) days, there were 194 deaths, including 7 cardiovascular deaths, and 28 heart failure events with no difference in events between the MUGA and echocardiography groups. There were no imaging predictors of the primary composite outcome or cardiac events. Patients without follow-up imaging had similar adjusted risk for the composite outcome compared to those with imaging follow-up, hazard ratio 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.5,1.3), p=0.457. Conclusion: The selection of pretreatment echocardiography or MUGA did not influence the risk of death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer. Many patients did not have any follow-up cardiac imaging and did not suffer worse outcomes. Cardiovascular deaths and heart failure event rates were low and the value of long-term cardiac imaging surveillance should be further evaluated.

Indexed as

breast cancercardiac imagingcardiotoxicitysurveillancesurvival

Identifiers

PMID37441421
PMCPMC10335844
OpenAlexW4382458394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.