Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441347›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Assessment of the VENUSS and GRANT Models for Individual Prediction of Cancer-specific Survival in Surgically Treated Nonmetastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Mattia L Piccinelli, Stefano Tappero, Cristina Cano Garcia, Francesco Barletta, Reha-Baris Incesu, Simone Morra, Lukas Scheipner, Zhe Tian, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A Mistretta and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Mattia L PiccinelliCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Stefano TapperoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Cristina Cano GarciaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Francesco BarlettaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Reha-Baris IncesuCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Simone MorraCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Lukas ScheipnerCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Stefano LuzzagoDepartment of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Francesco A MistrettaDepartment of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Matteo FerroDepartment of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sascha AhyaiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicola LongoDepartment of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Felix K H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Ottavio de CobelliDepartment of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Gennaro MusiDepartment of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
University of Milan · ITUniversité de Montréal · CAGoethe University Frankfurt · DEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMedical University of Graz · ATOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JOEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITKoç University · TRUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend VENUSS and GRANT models for the prediction of cancer control outcomes after nephrectomy for nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). Objective: To test the ability of VENUSS and GRANT models to predict 5-yr cancer-specific survival in a North American population. Design setting and participants: For this retrospective study, we identified 4184 patients with unilateral surgically treated nonmetastatic pRCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The original VENUSS and GRANT risk categories were applied to predict 5-yr cancer-specific survival. A cross-validation method was used to test the accuracy and calibration of the models and to conduct decision curve analyses for the study cohort. Results and limitations: The VENUSS and GRANT categories represented independent predictors of cancer-specific mortality. On cross-validation, the accuracy of the VENUSS and GRANT risk categories was 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Both models showed good calibration and performed better than random predictions in decision curve analysis. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of a central pathological review. Conclusion: VENUSS risk categories fulfilled prognostic model criteria for predicting cancer-specific survival 5 yr after surgery in North American patients with nonmetastatic pRCC as recommended by guidelines. Conversely, GRANT risk categories did not. Thus, VENUSS risk categories represent an important tool for counseling, follow-up planning, and patient selection for appropriate adjuvant trials in pRCC. Patient summary: We tested the ability of two validated methods (VENUSS and GRANT) to predict death due to papillary kidney cancer in a North American population. The VENUSS risk categories showed good performance in predicting 5-year cancer-specific survival.

Indexed as

Cancer-specific mortalityPapillary kidney cancerPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID37441347
PMCPMC10334233
OpenAlexW4380886773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.